* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
@ 2000-06-08 10:50 Nick Clifton
2000-06-08 11:25 ` David O'Brien
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2000-06-08 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: obrien; +Cc: dfr, binutils, mjacob, gallatin
Hi David,
: I've already got a ChangeLog for it, it actually isn't Doug's patch.
: If this is permission, I will commit it to HEAD and 2.10 branches.
: If I am only cleared to fix it in HEAD please mention that too. :-)
This is approval for HEAD only.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
2000-06-08 10:50 (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register Nick Clifton
@ 2000-06-08 11:25 ` David O'Brien
2000-06-08 13:34 ` Philip Blundell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David O'Brien @ 2000-06-08 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: dfr, binutils, mjacob, gallatin
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 10:49:59AM -0700, Nick Clifton wrote:
> This is approval for HEAD only.
Is there still a chance for this to go into 2.10 if someone else speaks
up, or there is zero chance for it to into 2.10?
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
2000-06-08 11:25 ` David O'Brien
@ 2000-06-08 13:34 ` Philip Blundell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Philip Blundell @ 2000-06-08 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: obrien; +Cc: binutils
>> This is approval for HEAD only.
>
>Is there still a chance for this to go into 2.10 if someone else speaks
>up, or there is zero chance for it to into 2.10?
Let's leave this one to 2.10.1 as well. I don't think it's a critical bug.
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
@ 2000-06-08 12:14 Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2000-06-08 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: obrien; +Cc: binutils
Hi David,
: Is there still a chance for this to go into 2.10 if someone else speaks
: up, or there is zero chance for it to into 2.10?
This is up to Philip Blundell to decide.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
2000-06-08 10:07 (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto " Nick Clifton
@ 2000-06-08 10:13 ` David O'Brien
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David O'Brien @ 2000-06-08 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: dfr, binutils, mjacob, gallatin
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 10:07:13AM -0700, Nick Clifton wrote:
> : David has asked me to comment on this minor patch to binutils to try to
> : get it included in the 2.10 release. I have been working with the alpha
> : architecture for several years and I did the original FreeBSD/alpha kernel
> : port to this architecture.
>
> I assume, although you do not mention this specifically, that you
> would also like to see this patch go into the mainline sources as
> well?
>
> The patch itself is fine. If you can provide a ChangeLog entry then I
> will be happy to check it into the repository.
I've already got a ChangeLog for it, it actually isn't Doug's patch.
If this is permission, I will commit it to HEAD and 2.10 branches.
If I am only cleared to fix it in HEAD please mention that too. :-)
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-06-08 13:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-06-08 10:50 (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register Nick Clifton
2000-06-08 11:25 ` David O'Brien
2000-06-08 13:34 ` Philip Blundell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-06-08 12:14 Nick Clifton
2000-06-08 10:07 (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto " Nick Clifton
2000-06-08 10:13 ` (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to " David O'Brien
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).