* approved commit to the 2.10 branch??
@ 2000-06-18 21:59 David O'Brien
2000-06-18 22:53 ` Alan Modra
2000-06-19 7:41 ` Philip Blundell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David O'Brien @ 2000-06-18 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GNU Binutils mailing list
I noticed that `amorda' just committed to ld/scripttempl/elf.sc on the
2.10 branch. Was this an approved commit? I didn't see anything in the
mailing list about it?
My concern is there isn't a 2.10-release tag on the branch yet. So
finding changes from 2.10-release will be harder if people commit to the
branch before Philip has a chance to officially release 2.10.
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: approved commit to the 2.10 branch??
2000-06-18 21:59 approved commit to the 2.10 branch?? David O'Brien
@ 2000-06-18 22:53 ` Alan Modra
2000-06-19 7:41 ` Philip Blundell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Modra @ 2000-06-18 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David O'Brien; +Cc: GNU Binutils mailing list
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> I noticed that `amorda' just committed to ld/scripttempl/elf.sc on the
> 2.10 branch. Was this an approved commit? I didn't see anything in the
> mailing list about it?
I mailed Philip directly about the 2.10 branch change. The changes to the
trunk were posted under the subjects
targets supporting garbage collection
Re: Test case which displays problem found in libstdc++-v3 effort
--
Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: approved commit to the 2.10 branch??
2000-06-18 21:59 approved commit to the 2.10 branch?? David O'Brien
2000-06-18 22:53 ` Alan Modra
@ 2000-06-19 7:41 ` Philip Blundell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Philip Blundell @ 2000-06-19 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: obrien; +Cc: GNU Binutils mailing list
>My concern is there isn't a 2.10-release tag on the branch yet. So
>finding changes from 2.10-release will be harder if people commit to the
>branch before Philip has a chance to officially release 2.10.
It's OK, I have a local working directory that represents the precise state of
the release and I can tag from that. I haven't had a chance to do that yet
because I'm several hundred miles from my desk at the moment.
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-06-19 7:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-06-18 21:59 approved commit to the 2.10 branch?? David O'Brien
2000-06-18 22:53 ` Alan Modra
2000-06-19 7:41 ` Philip Blundell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).