From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-h1p-028595.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-h1p-028595.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fd02:2446::3]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27BD23858C53 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:40:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 27BD23858C53 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=comcast.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=comcast.net Received: from resomta-h1p-027912.sys.comcast.net ([96.102.179.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resqmta-h1p-028595.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id ZUujqgKJ9WTYFZX3AqQENs; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:40:32 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1692970832; bh=6YDW0tNuTQ4zyRWMT0NkmBUGJYYUFj1kGya/wC3rznY=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To:Xfinity-Spam-Result; b=YrHK59v87ijcG/MzkQRszuU9Ym37d4C0AevMugmgpUIBSGQaDY2JQuTcV2Qpb2FTz rRcU1AbquynCIleqjA8LzNbAkpd2zWK0OznzkyqG+7QiNRmGneE43dcmI7xwtBScqz GkVjPRlUOf/TpV48M7Cmp9L3aliyjNOLMF8lsmcn2i6FdtulNUv7fJIWlcRT6sV6US M9bFLwhZSsRAri5w7MqITB7eCPITCGe7Lcxzi+v9uTctfzx3mEO3XhrJxXt+e3Dv2f qqyBaX4knmdM5R8U5RuJsxrLNAKhnoteUK1++1bAT1IccJc/dUSXnFw5jwcwtHHHOj NFAtF3DhRaANA== Received: from smtpclient.apple ([73.60.223.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resomta-h1p-027912.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id ZX33qMyzBTmx7ZX34qPz4Y; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:40:31 +0000 X-Xfinity-VAAS: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedruddvkedgieejucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuvehomhgtrghsthdqtfgvshhipdfqfgfvpdfpqffurfetoffkrfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrrghulhcumfhonhhinhhguceophgruhhlkhhonhhinhhgsegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelvedvhfffledujedvleeuffetudefvefhueffleefjeettdduhedvkeehvddvteenucfkphepjeefrdeitddrvddvfedruddtudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopehsmhhtphgtlhhivghnthdrrghpphhlvgdpihhnvghtpeejfedriedtrddvvdefrddutddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgruhhlkhhonhhinhhgsegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhrtghpthhtohepjhgsvghulhhitghhsehsuhhsvgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehjrggtohgssehjrggtohgsrdhrvghmtghomhhprdhfrhdprhgtphhtthhopegsihhnuhhtihhlshesshhouhhrtggvfigrrhgvrdhorhhg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.4\)) Subject: Re: P.S. Follow up to my last post From: Paul Koning In-Reply-To: <60877e9d-f6b1-a319-2383-0a87c980aea8@suse.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 09:40:24 -0400 Cc: jacob navia , binutils@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1140E4A3-B227-4824-B4D1-88A95910C0CC@jacob.remcomp.fr> <7ae0d3c7-d785-d693-03c1-989e399db7c8@suse.com> <10D53FD6-B509-4F68-A06D-2EC17F99AC43@jacob.remcomp.fr> <60877e9d-f6b1-a319-2383-0a87c980aea8@suse.com> To: Jan Beulich X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.4) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > On Aug 25, 2023, at 9:30 AM, Jan Beulich via Binutils = wrote: >=20 > On 25.08.2023 15:07, jacob navia wrote: >> OK, there is no bug, I didn=E2=80=99t expect anything else. >>=20 >> SO: >>=20 >> To use all the instruction of the processor he/she is running on, the = user should: >>=20 >> 1)Be aware that gcc doesn=E2=80=99t see crucial instructions of the = processor by verifying its assembler output. >>=20 >> 2) Be aware that there is an (undocumented) option -march=E2=80=A6 = that will enable the assembler and the compiler to generate all the = instructions of the current processor. >>=20 >> Well, there is NO BUG! >=20 > Well, if -march=3D is indeed undocumented for gcc, that's something > worth reporting there then, I would say. It would be if it were true, but of course it is not. -march is clearly = mentioned in the info pages, the man pages, and in "gcc --target-help". = Likewise, it is documented in the info pages, man pages, and "as = --help". paul