From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-36848-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 3737 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2004 14:20:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2992 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2004 14:19:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.111.177)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Dec 2004 14:19:23 -0000
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:17:12 +0000
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'Jan Beulich'" <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	<nickc@redhat.com>
Cc: <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: stripping symbols needed for relocations
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:20:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <s1c18b0d.072@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
Message-ID: <NUTMEGSTXoBDi0QrAh2000007db@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Dec 2004 14:17:12.0390 (UTC) FILETIME=[EF9E6660:01C4E379]
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: binutils-owner On Behalf Of Jan Beulich
> Sent: 16 December 2004 13:19

> >   * Please consider creating a new test in the binutils testsuite to
> 
> >check the behaviour of this feature.
> 
> Not done, primarily because none of the other --strip options seem to
> be tested.

  That seems a fairly dubious line of reasoning to me.

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....