From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12887 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2002 04:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12880 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2002 04:20:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2002 04:20:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 41000 invoked by uid 20157); 10 Oct 2002 04:20:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Oct 2002 04:20:35 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 21:20:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-X-Sender: hp@dair.pair.com To: Stephen Clarke cc: "H. J. Lu" , Subject: Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output In-Reply-To: <005401c26fd3$5134c2b0$6301a8c0@wren> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Stephen Clarke wrote: > From: "Hans-Peter Nilsson" > Subject: Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output > > --- ld/testsuite/ld-sh/sh.exp 30 Aug 2002 00:51:57 -0000 > > ! if { ([istarget sh64-*-elf] > > ! || [istarget sh64*-*-linux*])} { > > I'd rather you tweak the target specifiers on the tests: > > #targets: sh-*-* shl*-*-* shb*-*-* > > in each *.d should suffice. > > It turns out that only ld-r-1.d matches > the sh64*-*-linux* target - none of the other *.d match > any linux configuration. > > But I'm a bit nervous about the exact change you suggest, > because I thought sh[1234]-linux were supported > targets? Right. > How about the following instead: > Index: ld-r-1.d > #target: sh*-*-elf sh*-*-linux* > + #notarget: sh64*-*-linux* Yes, using "notarget" (doh, missed that one) is fine of course. As long as the target exclusion is in each test rather than before the whole test-loop. brgds, H-P