From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14351 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2004 00:58:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14343 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2004 00:58:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2004 00:58:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 76921 invoked by uid 20157); 26 Apr 2004 00:58:41 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 02:14:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-X-Sender: hp@dair.pair.com To: Zack Weinberg cc: Andreas Schwab , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: demand_empty_rest_of_line and ignore_rest_of_line In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <40587E7B.10705@codesourcery.com> <405979E9.9030805@codesourcery.com> <87brlhdk47.fsf@codesourcery.com> <87llkja8pf.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00684.txt.bz2 On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > I recall right, and so we've had a chance to try the same assembly > > language both ways, and I vastly prefer it with the tab and the space. > > FWIW, I think you can have the TAB, but not the extra space in > the parameters. Nope, sorry for the misinformation. For the old discussion, see . (And it's 2% not 1%.) brgds, H-P