From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-33213-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26441 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2004 18:38:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26434 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2004 18:38:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2004 18:38:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 41618 invoked by uid 20157); 26 Apr 2004 18:38:08 -0000
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:26:00 -0000
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
X-X-Sender: hp@dair.pair.com
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: demand_empty_rest_of_line and ignore_rest_of_line
In-Reply-To: <m365bmajb4.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0404261424220.19752@dair.pair.com>
References: <40587E7B.10705@codesourcery.com> <m3lllzo1vt.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
 <405979E9.9030805@codesourcery.com> <m3n052qw2g.fsf@whitebox.m5r.de>
 <Pine.BSF.4.58.0404241152490.14545@dair.pair.com> <jewu45i8gl.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
 <Pine.BSF.4.58.0404241355010.34988@dair.pair.com> <jesmeti651.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
 <Pine.BSF.4.58.0404241431020.68135@dair.pair.com> <jeoephhxlv.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
 <Pine.BSF.4.58.0404241755510.6786@dair.pair.com> <87brlhdk47.fsf@codesourcery.com>
 <m3zn90gaso.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <87d65va8gd.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
 <m3isfnbi55.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <87u0z78ni8.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
 <m3wu42am0e.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <jeu0z6u8ip.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
 <1082989916.14083.8.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <m365bmajb4.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00699.txt.bz2

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com> writes:
>
    Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > Currently (gcc 3.4.0) there are 5 targets that actually make use of
> > > #NO_APP: arm, cris, m68k, ns32k and vax (and m68k-linux didn't in gcc
> > > 3.0.x upto 3.3.x due to a side effect of including "elfos.h", which
> > > redefines ASM_FILE_START).
> >
> > That's probably misleading.  The gcc might emit a directive for that,
> > but I'm almost certain the ARM assembler for one takes no notice of it.
>
> The code to handle #NO_APP in gas is independent of the CPU backend.
> The initial #NO_APP comment is recognized in input_file_open(); it
> must be the first characters in the file.  It then turns off
> preprocessing (i.e., calls to do_scrub_chars) except for code which
> follows #APP up to #NO_APP.
>
> That said, I don't see #NO_APP in assembler code generated by an
> xscale-elf compiler.

(I already mentioned, but some apparently missed it or
--hopefully not-- disbelieved it, so let me repeat anyway, that)
I checked arm-linux main trunk, confirming that *no* #NO_APP is
generated at the top of the generated assembly files.

I'm reluctant to accept the list above (except for CRIS and
m68k from previous checking) without checking myself. ;-)

brgds, H-P