From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15109 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2005 14:27:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15068 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2005 14:27:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2005 14:27:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 64569 invoked by uid 20157); 27 Jan 2005 14:27:28 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:27:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-X-Sender: hp@dair.pair.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Q: Estimated date for 2.16 release ? In-Reply-To: <20050127140010.GA447@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: References: <20050127140010.GA447@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > does > anyone know of issues that need to be resolved before the next release? Adding @INTLLIBS@ to the link lines so solaris (etc) gcc+binutils combined builds have a better chance of succeeding. Maybe I should open a binutils PR... See gcc.gnu.org/PR19468. BTW, was the intl/ directory about to be added to binutils? Maybe that and the fallout should be done before the release. Or maybe better done after branching? brgds, H-P