From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26494 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2005 09:25:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26410 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 09:25:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 09:25:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 73377 invoked by uid 20157); 9 Feb 2005 09:25:37 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:14:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-X-Sender: hp@dair.pair.com To: Jan Beulich cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: .macro behavior In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2 On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Jan Beulich wrote: > >But apparently there's bug, exposed by the change I asked for. > >I suggest you just hold off on your gas/mmix/relax2.s patch and > >let me handle it, once your patch is in. > > So am I getting you right, you want the patch to introduce a new > failure for mmix? That's fine with me (and hopefully with whoever > eventually approves the rest of the patch). Well, I don't really *want* that to happen. :-) I'm just saying that it shouldn't be a stop-gap if your patch is otherwise accepted. brgds, H-P