From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6157 invoked by alias); 6 May 2005 19:01:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6053 invoked from network); 6 May 2005 19:00:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 May 2005 19:00:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 79688 invoked by uid 20157); 6 May 2005 19:00:54 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 19:24:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-X-Sender: hp@dair.pair.com To: Steve Ellcey cc: binutils@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Question about another IA64 HP-UX build problem In-Reply-To: <200505052012.NAA17695@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Message-ID: References: <200505052012.NAA17695@hpsje.cup.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 On Thu, 5 May 2005, Steve Ellcey wrote: > Yes, I have built this on ia64-hpux before. It always gave a warning > because it didn't see the declaration of getc_unlocked in stdio.h. This > is because _REENTRENT is not defined and the HP-UX header file only > defines getc_unlocked when _REENTRENT is defined. Not that I usually point out obvious but consistent typos but if you don't mean s/_REENTRENT/_REENTRANT/ something is out of the ordinary and might need fixing. (And you might want to check that the typo doesn't creep into your code. ;-) brgds, H-P