From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>
To: Geoff Keating <geoffk@ozemail.com.au>
Cc: hjl@lucon.org, drepper@cygnus.com, ian@cygnus.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: A glibc dynamic linker or gld bug?
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 07:41:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990705083803.22308A-100000@Wakko.deltatee.com>
References: <199907050455.OAA00862@geoffk.wattle.id.au>
X-SW-Source: 1999-q3/msg00033.html

On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Geoff Keating wrote:

> I suspect there is a (possibly machine-specific) bug in your ld; in
> fact, I would suspect the problem is in linking PIC code into
> executables.

When I originally looked at this using a different test case (G++ and some
templates) I found that you could only get it to happen reliably on intel,
sparc showed something similar and alpha appeared to work correctly. 

The binutils version was

GNU ld version 2.9.1 (with BFD 2.9.1.0.24)

Jason