From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: To: Jeffrey A Law Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: include/elf/hppa.h in gdb 4.18 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 00:00:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <15249.929995792@upchuck.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-q2/msg00319.html On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > > In message < Pine.LNX.4.10.9906211444540.30178-100000@oar3remote >you write: > > > Don't even try to use the PA ELF tools right now. They're under major > > > reorganization. > > > > OK. I was just trying to update the gdb RTEMS patch to 4.18. > If you're just trying to get up to gdb-4.18 you can probably make a little > tweak or two. For some reason I thought you were trying to get the > mainline code building. You can probably delete the offending code in your > gdb-4.18 rtems patch. OK. I have not checked it yet but my hunch is that hppa1.1-elf would not build in gdb 4.18. So far I have not found another example that looked like that same enumerated type. I will try to build hppa1.1-elf just to make sure though and report on that. > > > I'd forgotten RTEMS depended on this stuff. Ugh. > > > > The RTEMS target is not much more than an alias. If I need to change to > > basing it on another target, it is not a big deal. Just let me know what > > the best embedded hppa1.1 target is once this settles out again. > I doubt you'll need to change it. We're just going to have to create a lot of > construction debris in the PA ELF code for a while. > > I'll be primarily concentrating on 64bit ELF, but it's going to have serious > impact on the 32bit ELF tools. The Linux folks are going to be beating on the > 32bit ELF tools (hopefully in parallel). The hppa is not the most popular RTEMS target. :) So I am not going to lose much sleep over it right now. --joel