public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christopher C. Chimelis" <chris@debian.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Jack Howarth <howarth@nitro.med.uc.edu>, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: -z combreloc
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 15:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110131827000.28511-100000@spawn.hockeyfiend.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BC8A9C4.70003@cygnus.com>

On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> I'm just suggesting a rename of the version number to something that 
> contains more than digits.  To pull something out of thin air - 
> 2.11.2.debian.5.  That way there isn't any confusion between your 
> releases and the official binutils releases.
> 
> As best as I can tell, both you and H.J. have now both adopted an 
> identical branch versioning schema.  Arrrg!

All of the Debian packages are based upon H.J.'s versions.  In fact, the
tarball within the .orig.tar.gz is straight from his ftp area.  Any
patches applied are contained the the debian/patches dir in the source
package.

Also, why should I diverge from the numbering scheme when no other vendors
are?  There are sub-versioning done on a Debian level anyway (ie. the
latest package in the archive is 2.11.92.0.5-2).

C

  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-13 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-13 13:15 Jack Howarth
2001-10-13 13:32 ` Jakub Jelinek
2001-10-13 13:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-13 15:30   ` Christopher C. Chimelis [this message]
2001-10-13 17:58     ` Andrew Cagney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-13 18:38 Jack Howarth
2001-10-13 19:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-13 19:14   ` Christopher C. Chimelis
2001-10-13 20:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-14  8:29   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-10-14  8:46     ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-13 10:47 Jack Howarth
2001-10-13 12:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-13 13:20 ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0110131827000.28511-100000@spawn.hockeyfiend.com \
    --to=chris@debian.org \
    --cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=howarth@nitro.med.uc.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).