From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
Cc: cgd@broadcom.com, David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406242031020.8569@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y8mdgryp.fsf@redhat.com>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Or should we get rid of the 20-bit "break" completely? The two-argument
> > version provides the same functionality, although the 10-bit codes to be
> > used do not map to the 20-bit equivalent "optically" very well.
> > Especially if decimal notation is used.
>
> I notice no-one's really responded to this question yet. FWIW, on gut
> instinct, I'd personally prefer to drop the 20-bit break than introduce
> a new, non-standard name for it.
Well, this is essentially what the patch does. Or do you mean: "drop it
and if anyone screams, consider an alternative?" I'd find it acceptable,
actually, but it's not my opinion that really matters here.
--
+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-24 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <40C9F5A4.2050606@avtrex.com>
[not found] ` <40C9F5FE.8030607@avtrex.com>
2004-06-11 18:22 ` David Daney
2004-06-11 19:12 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
[not found] ` <mailpost.1086981251.16853@news-sj1-1>
2004-06-11 19:28 ` cgd
2004-06-11 19:50 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-06-11 20:52 ` David Daney
2004-06-11 21:12 ` [Patch] (revised patch) " David Daney
2004-06-13 8:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-06-14 12:52 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-06-22 21:30 ` [Patch] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-06-23 19:33 ` David Daney
2004-06-23 19:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-06-24 10:39 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-06-24 18:34 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
[not found] ` <mailpost.1088102121.25381@news-sj1-1>
2004-06-24 18:47 ` cgd
2004-06-28 13:46 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-06-28 15:19 cgd
2004-06-28 15:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-19 14:22 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
[not found] ` <mailpost.1090246948.15046@news-sj1-1>
2004-07-19 15:19 ` cgd
2004-07-19 15:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-19 23:29 ` Thiemo Seufer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.55.0406242031020.8569@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl \
--to=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=cgd@broadcom.com \
--cc=ddaney@avtrex.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rsandifo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).