From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-40074-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25565 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2005 12:01:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25539 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2005 12:01:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2005 12:01:47 -0000
Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B377C926D;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:01:46 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:01:00 -0000
From: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix alpha relocation overflow (Re: PATCH: Add
 _bfd_elf_provide_symbol)
In-Reply-To: <20050425174359.GA2592@lucon.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504261359040.20714@wotan.suse.de>
References: <20050322170758.GA1330@lucon.org> <20050322204903.GA4693@lucon.org>
 <20050322224422.GA6367@lucon.org> <20050323020457.GM30711@bubble.modra.org>
 <20050323021109.GA19226@nevyn.them.org> <20050323041924.GA11208@lucon.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504250625140.20714@wotan.suse.de> <20050425145458.GA32362@lucon.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504251703020.20714@wotan.suse.de> <20050425172736.GA2235@lucon.org>
 <20050425174359.GA2592@lucon.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00774.txt.bz2

Hi,

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, H. J. Lu wrote:

> > How about this patch?
> 
> Wrong patch. This is the updated one.

Fixes the problem for me.  Btw. why did you chose the first non-code alloc 
section for this (I'm just curious)?  This will be .interp in practice 
most often.


Ciao,
Michael.