From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-38001-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23432 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2005 14:15:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22890 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 14:14:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dmz.algor.co.uk) (62.254.210.145)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 14:14:47 -0000
Received: from alg158.algor.co.uk ([62.254.210.158] helo=olympia.mips.com)
	by dmz.algor.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1D1Q1k-00024t-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:19:40 +0000
Received: from perivale.mips.com ([192.168.192.200])
	by olympia.mips.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1D1Pwh-000851-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:14:27 +0000
Received: from macro (helo=localhost)
	by perivale.mips.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1D1Pwh-0003Kz-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:14:27 +0000
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:11:00 -0000
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com>
To: Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, nigel@mips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for MIPS16 HI16/LO16 relocations
In-Reply-To: <1108518635.5077.80.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502161404540.12803@perivale.mips.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502151515210.11562@perivale.mips.com>
 <1108518635.5077.80.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-MTUK-Scanner: Found to be clean
X-MTUK-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-4.576,
	required 4, AWL, BAYES_00)
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00373.txt.bz2

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Eric Christopher wrote:

> I'm getting two new failures in the mips64-elf gas testsuite:
> 
> FAIL: MIPS16 lui/addi
> FAIL: MIPS16 lui/addi n32
> 
> with a bfd assertion failure of:
> 
> BFD: BFD 2.15.94 20050214 assertion
> fail /dzur/sourceware/binutils/src/bfd/elf32-mips.c:1140
> 
> and
> 
> BFD: BFD 2.15.94 20050214 assertion
> fail /dzur/sourceware/binutils/src/bfd/elfn32-mips.c:1697
> 
> respectively.

 Hmm, I've built and run the testsuite for your failing target using an 
unmodified checkout as of now and I cannot reproduce your failures.  In 
fact the source lines you've reported do not even contain BFD_ASSERT() 
statements.  Can you please verify you have a consistent snapshot?

  Maciej