From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-38144-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24722 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 18:40:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24514 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 18:40:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dmz.algor.co.uk) (62.254.210.145)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 18:40:40 -0000
Received: from alg158.algor.co.uk ([62.254.210.158] helo=olympia.mips.com)
	by dmz.algor.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1D3f1b-000331-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:44:47 +0000
Received: from perivale.mips.com ([192.168.192.200])
	by olympia.mips.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1D3ewW-0004nL-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:39:32 +0000
Received: from macro (helo=localhost)
	by perivale.mips.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1D3ewV-0005Ln-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:39:31 +0000
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:15:00 -0000
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS gas/ld test suite portability fixes
In-Reply-To: <20050222183053.GB23903@nevyn.them.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502221836200.20174@perivale.mips.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502221612240.20174@perivale.mips.com>
 <20050222183053.GB23903@nevyn.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-MTUK-Scanner: Found to be clean
X-MTUK-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-4.614,
	required 4, AWL, BAYES_00)
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00516.txt.bz2

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> >  We get failures due to a different alignment of sections, too.  Finally 
> > one of the ld cases omits emulation specification, which may also lead to 
> > a failure.
> 
> Adding an emulation will break the test on mips-sgi-irix6, which uses
> different emulation names (and doesn't include the "traditional"
> emulations).  jalbal used to pass on IRIX 6.

 All other NewABI test cases pass an emulation option to ld.  I presume 
they currently fail for IRIX then, right?

> Not that I much care about the IRIX test results.  They're too much a
> mess right now to be useful.

 I can't really help with that, sorry.

  Maciej