From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27901 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 19:17:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27889 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 19:17:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl) (153.19.208.7) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 19:17:22 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE634E1C8A; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:17:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pollux [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18662-06; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:17:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from piorun.ds.pg.gda.pl (piorun.ds.pg.gda.pl [153.19.208.8]) by pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547EDE1C7F; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:17:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl (macro@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl [153.19.208.6]) by piorun.ds.pg.gda.pl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1MJHIdZ027158; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:17:19 +0100 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:02:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Eric Christopher Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: More MIPS testsuite fixes In-Reply-To: <1109097368.5032.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20050221155056.GA19151@nevyn.them.org> <20050221230621.GB900@bubble.modra.org> <20050221235443.GA25719@nevyn.them.org> <20050222004316.GB1757@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20050222182917.GA23903@nevyn.them.org> <1109097368.5032.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Status: Clean X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00518.txt.bz2 On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Eric Christopher wrote: > > That can't be resolved by using ELF and objcopy? That's where the > > discussion got stalled last time IIRC. > > > > I talked to some of the NetBSD guys yesterday. They believe that they > have their own elf to ecoff converter and don't need it, but I sent mail > to their toolchain list for verification. I'll take silence of a couple > of days as assent. :) I'd keep stuff like objcopy and objdump working to be able to do conversions and verify they have actually worked. Otherwise I don't care about ECOFF either. But this is not the right mailing list for people that actually use that stuff, so it may be quite a good idea to ask at a more appropriate forum, like . Also people may still keep using DEC Ultrix somewhere. ;-) Maciej