From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Eckhardt To: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: [patch] bfd, new bfd_relocs for i860 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 14:36:00 -0000 Message-id: X-SW-Source: 2000-07/msg00496.html These are new BFD_RELOC_*'s for i860. Are bfd-in2.h and libbfd.h the only regens I need to do for a change to reloc.c? 2000-07-30 Jason Eckhardt * bfd/reloc.c (BFD_RELOC_860_*): New bfd relocs for i860. * bfd/bfd-in2.h, libbfd.h: Regenerate. Index: bfd/reloc.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/reloc.c,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff -c -3 -p -r1.27 reloc.c *** reloc.c 2000/07/20 16:21:07 1.27 --- reloc.c 2000/07/30 21:32:21 *************** ENUMDOC *** 2912,2917 **** --- 2912,2988 ---- These relocs are only used within the CRIS assembler. They are not (at present) written to any object files. + ENUM + BFD_RELOC_860_NONE + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_32 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_COPY + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_GLOB_DAT + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_JUMP_SLOT + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_RELATIVE + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_PC26 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_PLT26 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_PC16 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOW0 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_SPLIT0 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOW1 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_SPLIT1 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOW2 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_SPLIT2 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOW3 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOT0 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_SPGOT0 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOT1 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_SPGOT1 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOTOFF0 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_SPGOTOFF0 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOTOFF1 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_SPGOTOFF1 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOTOFF2 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOTOFF3 + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_LOPC + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_HIGHADJ + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_HAGOT + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_HAGOTOFF + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_HAPC + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_HIGH + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_HIGOT + ENUMX + BFD_RELOC_860_HIGOTOFF + ENUMDOC + Intel i860 Relocations. + ENDSENUM BFD_RELOC_UNUSED CODE_FRAGMENT