From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-39358-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9326 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2005 09:07:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9040 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 09:06:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.213.68)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 09:06:58 -0000
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.308 [266.9.1]); Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:06:55 +0100
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:06:42 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'Alan Modra'" <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: "'Andy Chittenden'" <AChittenden@bluearc.com>,
	"'Pieter Arnout'" <pieter@powerescape.com>,
	<binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: objdump --syms -j .text
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:07:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20050404005043.GF7121@bubble.modra.org>
Message-ID: <SERRANOh524DidJ1Ilt0000001c@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2005 09:06:43.0431 (UTC) FILETIME=[9EEB9770:01C538F5]
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2

----Original Message----
>From: Alan Modra
>Sent: 04 April 2005 01:51

> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:58:50AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> It would be great if we didn't have to do that objcopy as well (ie for
>>> objdump to take note of the -j .text option when dumping symbols).
>> 
>>   On the face of it this sounds like a real bug; I'll file a bugzilla on
>> it, so as to make sure it doesn't get forgotten.
> 
> Even better would be filing a *patch*.  :)


  Well, yes, but first things first!


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....