From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-40142-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 534 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2005 12:05:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 471 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2005 12:05:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.213.68)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2005 12:05:54 -0000
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:06:57 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: "'Nick Clifton'" <nickc@redhat.com>
Cc: <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: HEAD b0rked re coff-tic80?
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:19:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <SERRANOlT2NqFJ3sl3x0000015d@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Message-ID: <SERRANOxf4yp8ARf3sl00000162@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Apr 2005 12:06:57.0464 (UTC) FILETIME=[C6801380:01C54BEA]
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00842.txt.bz2

----Original Message----
>From: Dave Korn
>Sent: 28 April 2005 11:44

> ----Original Message----
>> From: Nick Clifton
>> Sent: 28 April 2005 11:36
> 
>> Hi Dave,
>> 
>>>   There's something more fundamental here, isn't there?  Presumably
>>> obj-coff.h and tc-i386.h have not previously been being included in the
>>> same compilation unit.  Previously it was coff-tic80.h and the system's
>>> /usr/include/_ansi.h, so something's now pulling lots of coff-related
>>> headers into places they didn't used to be, perhaps?
>> 
>> Indeed.  How exactly did you configure this toolchain ?  And what type
>> of host are you building it on ?
> 
> 
> 
> dk@mace /usr/build/binutils-obj> head -7 config.status  | tail -1
> # /usr/build/binutils-src/src/configure  --prefix=/usr/build/install -v
> dk@mace /usr/build/binutils-obj> /usr/build/binutils-src/src/config.guess
> i686-pc-cygwin
> dk@mace /usr/build/binutils-obj>

  Oops.  Wrong build dir.  Host still applies, but configure command did of
course have all targets enabled:

dk@mace /usr/build/binutils-obj-new> head -7 config.status  | tail -1
# /usr/build/binutils-src/src/configure  --prefix=/usr/build/install
--enable-ta
rgets=all -v

..pardon the noise.  I'm just trying it again with a freshly-checkedout cvs
tree; if anything changes I'll report.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....