From: "Cui, Lili" <lili.cui@intel.com>
To: "Beulich, Jan" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>,
"binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 3/8] Support APX GPR32 with extend evex prefix
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:10:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB5600932DBD87D42A1E44FA909EB0A@SJ0PR11MB5600.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a53a2a41-1fe6-44e7-936f-52da83716046@suse.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 9:58 PM
> To: Cui, Lili <lili.cui@intel.com>
> Cc: Lu, Hongjiu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>; binutils@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/8] Support APX GPR32 with extend evex prefix
>
> On 15.11.2023 12:43, Cui, Lili wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 5:12 PM
> >>
> >> On 15.11.2023 07:03, Cui, Lili wrote:
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/opcodes/i386-dis-evex-x86-64.h
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> >>>>> + /* X86_64_EVEX_0F3849 */
> >>>>> + {
> >>>>> + { Bad_Opcode },
> >>>>> + { VEX_LEN_TABLE (VEX_LEN_0F3849_X86_64) }, },
> >>>>> + /* X86_64_EVEX_0F384B */
> >>>>> + {
> >>>>> + { Bad_Opcode },
> >>>>> + { VEX_LEN_TABLE (VEX_LEN_0F384B_X86_64) }, },
> >>>>> + /* X86_64_EVEX_0F38E0 */
> >>>>> + {
> >>>>> + { Bad_Opcode },
> >>>>> + { "cmpoxadd", { Mdq, Gdq, VexGdq }, PREFIX_DATA }, },
> >>>>
> >>>> This and its sibling entries look to again fully match
> >> X86_64_VEX_0F38E<n>.
> >>>
> >>> It cannot be moved to up level, it needs to go through
> >>> i386-dis-evex-x86-64.h
> >>
> >> I didn't suggest to move up a level. I suggested to re-use the
> >> existing VEX entries.
> >>
> >
> > It's currently in the x86-64 table, it's a bit weird to revisit the x86-64 table,
> and moving up one level won't work.
> >
> > { X86_64_TABLE (X86_64_VEX_0F38E0) }
> >
> > /* X86_64_VEX_0F38E0 */
> > {
> > { Bad_Opcode },
> > { "cmpoxadd", { Mdq, Gdq, VexGdq }, PREFIX_DATA },
> > },
>
> Again - I never suggested to move up a level. I also didn't suggest to re-visit
> x86_64_table[]. I merely requested to re-use X86_64_VEX_0F38Ex in the
> evex_table[] entries, instead of adding 16 (each) identical new entries to
> x86_64_table[] with 16 new X86_64_EVEX_0F38Ex enumerators.
>
We need to go through this virtual table USE_X86_64_EVEX_FROM_VEX_TABLE to mark event_type = evex_from_vex;
Lili
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-16 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-03 16:50 Cui, Lili
2023-11-06 17:07 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-13 5:53 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-13 8:34 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-14 3:12 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-14 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-15 8:39 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-07 13:29 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-09 8:38 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-09 11:07 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-09 11:12 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-07 14:53 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-09 12:31 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-09 13:05 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-09 14:57 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-09 15:39 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-14 7:42 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-14 10:40 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-14 14:46 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-15 6:03 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-15 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-15 11:43 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-16 13:57 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-16 15:10 ` Cui, Lili [this message]
2023-11-16 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-16 16:12 ` Cui, Lili
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SJ0PR11MB5600932DBD87D42A1E44FA909EB0A@SJ0PR11MB5600.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=lili.cui@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=hongjiu.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).