> Actually using EM_NANOMIPS throughout just as in v3 would make more sense
> than EM_IMG1.  The sole reason for the existence of EM_IMG1 was to have a
> placeholder before the name of nanoMIPS project could have been disclosed
> to the public.  I remember this being discussed, though I can't find a
> reference now (perhaps it was internal).
>
>   Maciej

That makes sense to me too. Thank you!
I will change it in v5.

Aleksandar