public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: fix JAL aliases ordering in opcode table
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 08:56:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7aClIl4B+co2/rG@aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe79a92e-e14d-ac35-c326-71afa9261073@suse.com>

On 2023-01-04 08:50, Jan Beulich via Binutils wrote:
> On 04.01.2023 06:59, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Commit 839189bc932e ("RISC-V: re-arrange opcode table for consistent
> > alias handling") reorder the instructions in the opcode tables,
> > including the various JAL aliases. In particular they are not ordered
> > anymore from the most specific to the less specific one. This causes the
> > form "JAL reg, imm" to emit a relocation with the register name. This
> > breaks various things like building Linux kernel modules.
> > 
> > This patch fixes the issue by restoring the original ordering of the JAL
> > aliases.
> 
> I'm afraid reverting the "offending" hunk is only a workaround, as it
> would re-introduce the disassembler side issue that the patch tried to
> deal with (and which sadly looks to not be covered by anything in the
> testsuite, or else you would have noticed breakage when testing your
> change). Since I expect that in the course of table lookup it is still
> the correct entry (in particular one with two rather than just one
> operands) which is used, my suspicion is that something somewhere makes
> a silent assumption upon the (original) ordering of table entries. It
> would be that place which needs fixing then; I'll try to find time soon
> to see if I can spot where that is.

Thanks for the analysis. Do you think you have time to get a patch with
that fix before the 2.40 release?

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-05  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-04  5:59 Aurelien Jarno
2023-01-04  7:43 ` Nelson Chu
2023-01-04  7:50 ` Jan Beulich
2023-01-05  7:56   ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
2023-01-05  8:20     ` Jan Beulich
2023-01-08 13:53       ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7aClIl4B+co2/rG@aurel32.net \
    --to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).