From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30D03857C66 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 00:56:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E30D03857C66 Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id j3so2214009plx.7 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 17:56:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=buNRQpkbGdacxfbzvm5gwFpfyuA+uiovq4qmsB7xUxE=; b=JQaKM/aLmqU1fV9HIfACvr2skfxLX8RaUFwrPZwyKJT9pKh1hvH4Rhk7BwvGgu1y5X PyJvuCKC+AFIbfJ9RLjuKQWc3nJje4qgkfOiA4s2088TOIUDnQqlXSpCvzbyszNHnNkR oHWRBIS7IdbEwof7f7ZphHO8iC4eQJTROLwGu2oj4b5Yt7VgCBr1wSZimSmbhsI98Of/ xTpZdX0Z6yQ5XJaQEzCIWtDmVrnbsCrRTCGDWuA5z9HmhkPSjveKtEIdoRf8jP0tEcTf HpIcUktRf+JXtqX/vf6wqZKA+aL/KokilGdrOwVjB9yNoJhYymHxGVUurPrVly5pfJoK LEzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MH3S8TRdl/i6FoDWvFG6z4+J0AlB35quYXfMq52PtBr/MReDq yz/QaDpt8z4I2T14YSPKwcI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx48Icg4/b+UrN2Pl2g7+3L03Dqxt53T8qLvcS4HAKPXlP4BWDHr9XGOod0yHqYdpxomAZ/2A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c096:: with SMTP id o22mr7565320pjs.23.1625792202126; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 17:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from squeak.grove.modra.org ([2406:3400:51d:8cc0:108e:2f18:10d4:674b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j13sm3041455pjl.1.2021.07.08.17.56.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Jul 2021 17:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by squeak.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9517F1140473; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:26:38 +0930 (ACST) Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:26:38 +0930 From: Alan Modra To: Florian Weimer Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Binutils , Marcus Shawcroft , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Nick Clifton , Richard Earnshaw Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] elf: Implement indirect external access marker Message-ID: References: <20210622235715.2813205-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <87a6my6x67.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87tul65hcw.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tul65hcw.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3031.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:56:44 -0000 On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 04:27:43PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Hmm, I see. I guess it's up to the binutils maintainers to decide. The current patch looks reasonable to me. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM