From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0788A3864858 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 01:10:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0788A3864858 Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id p4-20020a17090a9304b029016f3020d867so8062305pjo.3 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 18:10:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=/hKgSPN5Mwe7olMKEXPxd7M+abApqkAz6BDNENKszFs=; b=Ksy/vqe9fakMrhXp1r8q68raUOvj26spe5lHq2aiSsOBs3qbwEUUqxbmYIqDigaoA5 XjhBnP/sVOPc2u+MVkdpMSJeXM9MvmPAgab5i5zXoTSaXV2yj7CN3cSUM2v++WJEIxz4 jsH+S91VzoCelXEHEImAed+xNZpUTXyKYWjc/peOdojpxoYLiDvs65zocVhbrpaqKXQ7 +jYOCkaGYdDG6xoomb47M9LLxgUUvDDWCxbwLEObMZBYnjYKJQm33/MXwwmxJq0n+Tnl 9za+LF7YGJ1H2HJ6sng3XCW10en792C8MI0NMPuiZanRFCdmwSrkdb/XMTGuaK+0Pigj l9kg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gdqnsmXF/iPLKutqRXsebeFd/Qp5Of8IVkf4mipxQ8UW3psZR qXxvhQJbSYc0Xxoi3oIG6ivSNwZKs4BfTg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJylNDi3c0KmwDkSETYCoAW6ZB3+x2bNQ2Kgj9BX4rSQoX3GESlfPxziuJa5MBrkEDuUePlqYA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c986:: with SMTP id w6mr12896823pjt.158.1626484248132; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 18:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from squeak.grove.modra.org (158.106.96.58.static.exetel.com.au. [58.96.106.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u37sm11759520pfg.140.2021.07.16.18.10.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 18:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by squeak.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 32B621140074; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 10:40:44 +0930 (ACST) Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 10:40:44 +0930 From: Alan Modra To: Jan-Benedict Glaw Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Building with recent GCC versions: gdbsupport/gdb_assert.h:35:4: error: 'nonnull' argument 'filename' compared to NULL [-Werror=nonnull-compare] Message-ID: References: <20210716225325.bb2ibcf6pf2ykanj@lug-owl.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210716225325.bb2ibcf6pf2ykanj@lug-owl.de> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3033.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 01:10:50 -0000 On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 12:53:25AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Hi! > > I noticed that when building GDB with a quite recent gcc (ie. "gcc Wrong mailing list? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM