public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Jingtao Cai <caijingtao@huawei.com>, Bo Dong <dongbo4@huawei.com>,
	<binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] Aarch64: Allow explicit size specifier for predicate operand of {sq, uq, }{incp, decp}
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 19:33:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a75c15e6-4d5c-3a8c-121c-890f30eba8ac@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99db07d9-ad39-86a7-727d-be0edce7ab19@suse.com>

Hi Jan,

On 2022/3/10 18:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.03.2022 10:38, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
> 
> Despite this, ...
> 
>> On 2022/3/2 15:36, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
>>> On 2022/2/21 21:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 16.02.2022 01:53, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
>>>>> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_23.d
>>>>> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_23.d
>>>>> @@ -9,29 +9,29 @@ Disassembly of section .*:
>>>>>  
>>>>>  0+ <.*>:
>>>>>  [^:]+:	04512461 	movprfx	z1.h, p1/m, z3.h
>>>>> -[^:]+:	256c8021 	incp	z1.h, p1  // note: merging predicate expected due to preceding `movprfx' at operand 2
>>>>> +[^:]+:	256c8021 	incp	z1.h, p1.h  // note: merging predicate expected due to preceding `movprfx' at operand 2
>>>>
>>>> I have a more general question here: Couldn't the spec make optional the
>>>> use of all the same size specifiers when there are multiple, same element
>>>> size operands? One such suffix of course needs to be there to disambiguate
>>>
>>> We are not from ARM SPEC group and don't know the exact considerations for
>>> the forbidden omitting suffix. We guess people will have different answers from
>>> different points of view.
>>>
>>> >From our point of view,  a suffix makes the assembly more consistent with the
>>> scalar versions of `incp`, e.g. `incp x1, p2.b`. And the predicate register acts more
>>> like a vector register within this instruction, with suffix, the addend for each element
>>> is clear once reading the assembly string.
>>>
>>> Not sure that anyone from ARM in the mail-list can give more hints or thoughts.
>>>
>>
>> No any more comments from Arm guys.
>>
>> Is it ok for trunk?
> 
> ... I assume you understand that I'm not in the position to give you the
> wanted "okay"?

Apologies that I don't follow it completely, do you mean that does it need
someone to agree and take it? Or we need more comments?

Thanks,
Shaokun

> 
> Jan
> 
> .
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-16  0:53 Shaokun Zhang
2022-02-21 13:13 ` Jan Beulich
2022-03-02  7:36   ` Shaokun Zhang
2022-03-10  9:38     ` Shaokun Zhang
2022-03-10 10:38       ` Jan Beulich
2022-03-10 11:33         ` Shaokun Zhang [this message]
2022-03-10 11:50           ` Jan Beulich
2022-03-10 12:24             ` Shaokun Zhang
2022-03-10 12:27 ` Shaokun Zhang
2022-09-12  8:17 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-09-12  8:27   ` Jan Beulich
2022-09-12  9:38     ` Richard Sandiford
2022-09-28  2:19   ` dongbo (E)
2022-09-30 14:54     ` Richard Sandiford
2022-10-09  1:31       ` dongbo (E)
2022-10-10 10:25         ` Richard Sandiford
2022-10-11  2:19           ` dongbo (E)
2022-10-17  9:33             ` Richard Sandiford
2022-10-18  5:57               ` dongbo (E)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a75c15e6-4d5c-3a8c-121c-890f30eba8ac@hisilicon.com \
    --to=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=caijingtao@huawei.com \
    --cc=dongbo4@huawei.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).