From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E8A3858422 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:45:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 40E8A3858422 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 40E8A3858422 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::236 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705909547; cv=none; b=qvFoQxi1H9uzGYp0sg+WiH+m2HxZ9EG6s7tgLGxmLwoaHurwPBe4IOvk9tZeoDSSDgDaFzCpkIwF0s85iuUkDk9NzJKP0HqsgHkEI7Ql+PGvnYh6gZXlPDaHFjG3TL2zP77UO6nZk/CT38E/g87UKxMHVzMwZNE+BnGLD0sAICE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705909547; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5wRz8O20rQMMAcMQok5RQEuIcoufUL1HIZaRXjhhuro=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=JNogOftyhDwe5+4BmL0BNA1EqY0Fo1PrLAd+N8iBvF/9FpLB/SBMTSyft86hU7BZx/0W70zrKOkROzZtTO2luhTfOou1WsazECEmRd5+0Eeai7CcrmppZYX3Kx/FlPnkF/uHEG6HS2kyZFWdpyjfdW3591wSE7P+EoZxotMCh54= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2cddf596321so29144921fa.0 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 23:45:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1705909543; x=1706514343; darn=sourceware.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from:references:cc :to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3DgYcL3uyxYz9nRD6Z47mOlkNFjLM+UI4wR/yFMfXmg=; b=ZxeckSRY292gbviqUkyvTxvUirDQYYavijKx6PT8WjY+jVwBfB+um66YVPAP1b/pvU piRgdvW2JQ2nKp35UpR6NstrXThMruLD6YPGX0KNbJuztrow74a7x2+qj5hz0Uh6KaZh A2qVt3GyxLvAGz+c9wNEknhGmPreTkWfgWNIrx56MxAEUU2bUVD2jqE9X3TTt/xqZGk6 fBDcFgfT5A20rrYmZGvBZymNvcom187vKZOnuGl5hsaygXgJJ1XiwF4vcGvtQQRS/J/1 AYQGCd6FJPH8BI+ddst0l4Maax21oA2MZuaq97KI1j8tnbZDpG1gi8UH/8/+lBHzccle jd6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705909543; x=1706514343; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from:references:cc :to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3DgYcL3uyxYz9nRD6Z47mOlkNFjLM+UI4wR/yFMfXmg=; b=ZNhIOLHQk0E12WW2IwIHfjsO9fa5WVTWm/37mwkDbbVcXpXP0jmfvSKPwc2LciRBP1 8BoxmIX5ihnSwgTOoGX2LpLfNAOm1HYQDzCxusYwAjfQObKANpjm61qtdlUjvB5CG3km Mi2YoPRCMy574/wTmhl4IWsdoebgNX+RyNvO+MFqwnCi6qePRd6l+WusM3GkV5etor+H PDfpYAnVNk9Nmyt9uzCloESAp5lWdmyq1L+q91D3tmtn52AKzSm+jQCfLkUNNTkph5A+ G+YUn/rPUgSyeRO9GeDjkgEi/AJTl1G7qkFH6AEAQ9reOZjYDxwqtAunSCgnzx4xfdPg YmOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzMz/q9AMu0GBIa/grUg6ciVgC0x2tLNCkIiiE0OVvdBNWiisNE YVkcO1oU4vT0F1/nhTdZIghvBobKSA2RAvLtD7YTpZ9xVxIGiIvhUcUsUMadPw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHI8oPDzqP45k9pjHmqCJKrEO08oDRxojKjh3oQibmtubMIG43tfnom2d5psm7XM5ihZYrpjg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0f4:0:b0:2cc:603f:5cd7 with SMTP id h20-20020a2eb0f4000000b002cc603f5cd7mr1452311ljl.6.1705909542726; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 23:45:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.156.60.236] (ip-037-024-206-209.um08.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [37.24.206.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c34-20020a029625000000b0046e4c2f9f5csm3025352jai.28.2024.01.21.23.45.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Jan 2024 23:45:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:45:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: New (APX related) assembler testsuite failures Content-Language: en-US To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Nick Clifton , "Cui, Lili" , Binutils References: <55300a38-7779-4e6b-aa4f-9812e00e34de@redhat.com> From: Jan Beulich Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@suse.com; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3025.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 19.01.2024 15:46, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 6:35 AM Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> On 19.01.2024 15:32, Nick Clifton wrote: >>> Hi Cui, Hi Jan, >>> >>> I am seeing two new failures in the gas testsuite: >>> >>> FAIL: x86_64 APX_F EVEX-Promoted insns >>> FAIL: x86_64 APX_F EVEX-Promoted insns (Intel disassembly) >>> >>> These only occur in x86_64 toolchains configured for PE targets >>> (eg x86_64-pc-mingw64) and are happening because these targets >>> pad out code sections in order to allow for section alignment. >>> The testsuite log shows: >>> >>> extra lines in tmpdir/dump.out starting with "^ b8c: 90 nop$" >>> EOF from /work/sources/binutils/upstream/current/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-apx-evex-promoted-intel.d >>> >>> Could you take a look and maybe tweak something please ? >> >> I'll deal with that on Monday. I'm surprised though, as I thought I >> had sorted such already. But it must have been some other testcase >> then ... > > I pushed the fix into master branch and backported it to > binutils-2_42-branch. Thanks for taking care of this. Nevertheless I have to admit I'm a little disappointed that you didn't check the other APX testcases as well. I'll commit an adjustment to the PUSH2/POP2 testcases in a few minutes. Which gets me to the 2nd point: Please can you "blame" the correct patch when writing titles / descriptions of new ones (if you feel like doing any blaming in the first place)? It was not my patch which introduced the issue. Instead when the testcases were first added the trap was set out for someone to fall into. Much like iirc was the case for the USER_MSR testcases. Jan