public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders [PR31595]
@ 2024-04-17  9:44 Victor Do Nascimento
  2024-04-17  9:48 ` Nick Clifton
  2024-04-18  9:50 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Victor Do Nascimento @ 2024-04-17  9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils; +Cc: richard.earnshaw, nickc, Victor Do Nascimento

Given that the disassembler should never abort when decoding
(potentially random) data, assertion statements in the
`get_*reg_qualifier_from_value' function family prove problematic.

Consider the random 32-bit word W, encoded in a data segment and
encountered on execution of `objdump -D <obj_name>'.

If:

  (W & ~opcode_mask) == valid instruction

Then before `print_insn_aarch64_word' has a chance to report the
instruction as potentially undefined, an attempt will be made to have
the qualifiers for the instruction's register operands (if any)
decoded.  If the relevant bits do not map onto a valid qualifier for
the matched instruction-like word, an abort will be triggered and the
execution of objdump aborted.

As this scenario is perfectly feasible and, in light of the fact that
objdump must successfully decode all sections of a given object file,
it is not appropriate to assert in this family of functions.

Therefore, we add a new pseudo-qualifier `AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR' for
handling invalid qualifier-associated values and re-purpose the
assertion conditions in qualifier-retrieving functions to be the
predicate guarding the returning of the calculated qualifier type.
If the predicate fails, we return this new qualifier and allow the
caller to handle the error as appropriate.

As these functions are called either from within
`aarch64_extract_operand' or `do_special_decoding', both of which are
expected to return non-zero values, it suffices that callers return
zero upon encountering `AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR'.

Ar present the error presented in the hypothetical scenario has been
encountered in `get_sreg_qualifier_from_value', but the change is made
to the whole family to keep the interface consistent.

Bug: https://sourceware.org/PR31595
---
 .../testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d  |  1 +
 .../testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s  |  3 +
 include/opcode/aarch64.h                      |  3 +
 opcodes/aarch64-dis.c                         | 98 +++++++++++++++----
 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d
index 4b90a1d9f39..b69318aec85 100644
--- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d
+++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d
@@ -8,5 +8,6 @@ Disassembly of section \.text:
 
 0+000 <.*>:
 [ 	]+0:[ 	]+68ea18cc[ 	]+.inst[ 	]+0x68ea18cc ; undefined
+[ 	]+4:[ 	]+9dc39839[ 	]+.inst[ 	]+0x9dc39839 ; undefined
 #pass
 
diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s
index 216cbe6f265..43668c6db55 100644
--- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s
+++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s
@@ -4,4 +4,7 @@
 	# ldpsw   x12, x6, [x6],#-8 ; illegal because one of the dest regs is also the address reg
 	.inst 0x68ea18cc
 
+	# illegal, resembles the opcode `ldapur' with invalid qualifier bits
+	.inst 0x9dc39839
+
 	# FIXME: Add more illegal instructions here.
diff --git a/include/opcode/aarch64.h b/include/opcode/aarch64.h
index 2fca9528c20..e8fe93ef127 100644
--- a/include/opcode/aarch64.h
+++ b/include/opcode/aarch64.h
@@ -894,6 +894,9 @@ enum aarch64_opnd_qualifier
   /* Special qualifier helping retrieve qualifier information during the
      decoding time (currently not in use).  */
   AARCH64_OPND_QLF_RETRIEVE,
+
+  /* Special qualifier used for indicating error in qualifier retrieval.  */
+  AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR,
 };
 \f
 /* Instruction class.  */
diff --git a/opcodes/aarch64-dis.c b/opcodes/aarch64-dis.c
index 96f42ae862a..b70e6da9eb7 100644
--- a/opcodes/aarch64-dis.c
+++ b/opcodes/aarch64-dis.c
@@ -219,9 +219,10 @@ static inline enum aarch64_opnd_qualifier
 get_greg_qualifier_from_value (aarch64_insn value)
 {
   enum aarch64_opnd_qualifier qualifier = AARCH64_OPND_QLF_W + value;
-  assert (value <= 0x1
-	  && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value);
-  return qualifier;
+  if (value <= 0x1
+      && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value)
+    return qualifier;
+  return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR;
 }
 
 /* Given VALUE, return qualifier for a vector register.  This does not support
@@ -237,9 +238,10 @@ get_vreg_qualifier_from_value (aarch64_insn value)
   if (qualifier >= AARCH64_OPND_QLF_V_2H)
     qualifier += 1;
 
-  assert (value <= 0x8
-	  && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value);
-  return qualifier;
+  if (value <= 0x8
+      && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value)
+    return qualifier;
+  return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR;
 }
 
 /* Given VALUE, return qualifier for an FP or AdvSIMD scalar register.  */
@@ -248,9 +250,10 @@ get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (aarch64_insn value)
 {
   enum aarch64_opnd_qualifier qualifier = AARCH64_OPND_QLF_S_B + value;
 
-  assert (value <= 0x4
-	  && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value);
-  return qualifier;
+  if (value <= 0x4
+      && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value)
+    return qualifier;
+  return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR;
 }
 
 /* Given the instruction in *INST which is probably half way through the
@@ -263,13 +266,17 @@ get_expected_qualifier (const aarch64_inst *inst, int i)
 {
   aarch64_opnd_qualifier_seq_t qualifiers;
   /* Should not be called if the qualifier is known.  */
-  assert (inst->operands[i].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL);
-  int invalid_count;
-  if (aarch64_find_best_match (inst, inst->opcode->qualifiers_list,
-			       i, qualifiers, &invalid_count))
-    return qualifiers[i];
+  if (inst->operands[i].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL)
+    {
+      int invalid_count;
+      if (aarch64_find_best_match (inst, inst->opcode->qualifiers_list,
+				   i, qualifiers, &invalid_count))
+	return qualifiers[i];
+      else
+	return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL;
+    }
   else
-    return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL;
+    return AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR;
 }
 
 /* Operand extractors.  */
@@ -355,6 +362,8 @@ aarch64_ext_reglane (const aarch64_operand *self, aarch64_opnd_info *info,
 	  aarch64_insn value = extract_field (FLD_imm4_11, code, 0);
 	  /* Depend on AARCH64_OPND_Ed to determine the qualifier.  */
 	  info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+	  if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	    return 0;
 	  shift = get_logsz (aarch64_get_qualifier_esize (info->qualifier));
 	  info->reglane.index = value >> shift;
 	}
@@ -374,6 +383,8 @@ aarch64_ext_reglane (const aarch64_operand *self, aarch64_opnd_info *info,
 	  if (pos > 3)
 	    return false;
 	  info->qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (pos);
+	  if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	    return 0;
 	  info->reglane.index = (unsigned) (value >> 1);
 	}
     }
@@ -381,6 +392,8 @@ aarch64_ext_reglane (const aarch64_operand *self, aarch64_opnd_info *info,
     {
       /* Need information in other operand(s) to help decoding.  */
       info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+      if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
       switch (info->qualifier)
 	{
 	case AARCH64_OPND_QLF_S_4B:
@@ -405,6 +418,8 @@ aarch64_ext_reglane (const aarch64_operand *self, aarch64_opnd_info *info,
 
       /* Need information in other operand(s) to help decoding.  */
       info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+      if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
       switch (info->qualifier)
 	{
 	case AARCH64_OPND_QLF_S_H:
@@ -644,9 +659,15 @@ aarch64_ext_advsimd_imm_shift (const aarch64_operand *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
 	 1xxx	1	2D  */
       info->qualifier =
 	get_vreg_qualifier_from_value ((pos << 1) | (int) Q);
+      if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return false;
     }
   else
-    info->qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (pos);
+    {
+      info->qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (pos);
+      if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
+    }
 
   if (info->type == AARCH64_OPND_IMM_VLSR)
     /* immh	<shift>
@@ -773,6 +794,8 @@ aarch64_ext_advsimd_imm_modified (const aarch64_operand *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
 
   /* cmode */
   info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+  if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+    return 0;
   switch (info->qualifier)
     {
     case AARCH64_OPND_QLF_NIL:
@@ -1014,6 +1037,8 @@ aarch64_ext_ft (const aarch64_operand *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
       if (value > 0x4)
 	return false;
       info->qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
+      if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
     }
 
   return true;
@@ -1086,6 +1111,8 @@ aarch64_ext_rcpc3_addr_offset (const aarch64_operand *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
 			       aarch64_operand_error *errors ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 {
   info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+  if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+    return 0;
 
   /* Rn */
   info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (self->fields[0], code, 0);
@@ -1105,6 +1132,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_offset (const aarch64_operand *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
 			 aarch64_operand_error *errors ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 {
   info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+  if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+    return 0;
 
   /* Rn */
   info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (self->fields[0], code, 0);
@@ -1154,6 +1183,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_regoff (const aarch64_operand *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
       /* Need information in other operand(s) to help achieve the decoding
 	 from 'S' field.  */
       info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+      if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
       /* Get the size of the data element that is accessed, which may be
 	 different from that of the source register size, e.g. in strb/ldrb.  */
       size = aarch64_get_qualifier_esize (info->qualifier);
@@ -1172,6 +1203,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_simm (const aarch64_operand *self, aarch64_opnd_info *info,
 {
   aarch64_insn imm;
   info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+  if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+    return 0;
 
   /* Rn */
   info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (FLD_Rn, code, 0);
@@ -1210,6 +1243,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_uimm12 (const aarch64_operand *self, aarch64_opnd_info *info,
 {
   int shift;
   info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+  if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+    return 0;
   shift = get_logsz (aarch64_get_qualifier_esize (info->qualifier));
   /* Rn */
   info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (self->fields[0], code, 0);
@@ -1228,6 +1263,8 @@ aarch64_ext_addr_simm10 (const aarch64_operand *self, aarch64_opnd_info *info,
   aarch64_insn imm;
 
   info->qualifier = get_expected_qualifier (inst, info->idx);
+  if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+    return 0;
   /* Rn */
   info->addr.base_regno = extract_field (self->fields[0], code, 0);
   /* simm10 */
@@ -2467,6 +2504,8 @@ decode_sizeq (aarch64_inst *inst)
   if (mask == 0x7)
     {
       inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_vreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
+      if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
       return 1;
     }
 
@@ -2649,6 +2688,8 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
       idx = select_operand_for_sf_field_coding (inst->opcode);
       value = extract_field (FLD_sf, inst->value, 0);
       inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value (value);
+      if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
       if ((inst->opcode->flags & F_N)
 	  && extract_field (FLD_N, inst->value, 0) != value)
 	return 0;
@@ -2659,6 +2700,8 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
       idx = select_operand_for_sf_field_coding (inst->opcode);
       value = extract_field (FLD_lse_sz, inst->value, 0);
       inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value (value);
+      if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
     }
   /* rcpc3 'size' field.  */
   if (inst->opcode->flags & F_RCPC3_SIZE)
@@ -2670,12 +2713,18 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
 	{
 	  if (aarch64_operands[inst->operands[i].type].op_class
 	      == AARCH64_OPND_CLASS_INT_REG)
-	    inst->operands[i].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value (value & 1);
+	    {
+	      inst->operands[i].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value (value & 1);
+	      if (inst->operands[i].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+		return 0;
+	    }
 	  else if (aarch64_operands[inst->operands[i].type].op_class
 	      == AARCH64_OPND_CLASS_FP_REG)
 	    {
 	      value += (extract_field (FLD_opc1, inst->value, 0) << 2);
 	      inst->operands[i].qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
+	      if (inst->operands[i].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+		return 0;
 	    }
 	}
     }
@@ -2709,7 +2758,11 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
       /* For most related instruciton, the 'size' field is fully available for
 	 operand encoding.  */
       if (mask == 0x3)
-	inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
+	{
+	  inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
+	  if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	    return 0;
+	}
       else
 	{
 	  get_operand_possible_qualifiers (idx, inst->opcode->qualifiers_list,
@@ -2744,6 +2797,9 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
       Q = (unsigned) extract_field (FLD_Q, inst->value, inst->opcode->mask);
       inst->operands[0].qualifier =
 	get_vreg_qualifier_from_value ((num << 1) | Q);
+      if (inst->operands[0].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
+
     }
 
   if ((inst->opcode->flags & F_OPD_SIZE) && inst->opcode->iclass == sve2_urqvs)
@@ -2753,7 +2809,11 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
 				       inst->opcode->mask);
       inst->operands[0].qualifier
 	= get_vreg_qualifier_from_value (1 + (size << 1));
+      if (inst->operands[0].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
       inst->operands[2].qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (size);
+      if (inst->operands[2].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
     }
 
   if (inst->opcode->flags & F_GPRSIZE_IN_Q)
@@ -2772,6 +2832,8 @@ do_special_decoding (aarch64_inst *inst)
       assert (idx == 0 || idx == 1);
       value = extract_field (FLD_Q, inst->value, 0);
       inst->operands[idx].qualifier = get_greg_qualifier_from_value (value);
+      if (inst->operands[idx].qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
+	return 0;
     }
 
   if (inst->opcode->flags & F_LDS_SIZE)
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders [PR31595]
  2024-04-17  9:44 [PATCH] aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders [PR31595] Victor Do Nascimento
@ 2024-04-17  9:48 ` Nick Clifton
  2024-05-15 14:58   ` Victor Do Nascimento
  2024-04-18  9:50 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-04-17  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Victor Do Nascimento, binutils; +Cc: richard.earnshaw

Hi Victor,

> Bug: https://sourceware.org/PR31595
> ---
>   .../testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d  |  1 +
>   .../testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s  |  3 +
>   include/opcode/aarch64.h                      |  3 +
>   opcodes/aarch64-dis.c                         | 98 +++++++++++++++----

Approved - please apply - and thanks for fixing this! :-)

Cheers
   Nick


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders [PR31595]
  2024-04-17  9:44 [PATCH] aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders [PR31595] Victor Do Nascimento
  2024-04-17  9:48 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2024-04-18  9:50 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw (lists) @ 2024-04-18  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Victor Do Nascimento, binutils; +Cc: nickc

On 17/04/2024 10:44, Victor Do Nascimento wrote:
> @@ -1014,6 +1037,8 @@ aarch64_ext_ft (const aarch64_operand *self ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>        if (value > 0x4)
>  	return false;
^^^^

>        info->qualifier = get_sreg_qualifier_from_value (value);
> +      if (info->qualifier == AARCH64_OPND_QLF_ERR)
> +	return 0;
^^^^
>      }

I see Nick has already approved this, but spotted the above while scrolling through.  Mixing 'return false' and 'return 0' within a single function is poor coding style.  Please fix.

R.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders [PR31595]
  2024-04-17  9:48 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2024-05-15 14:58   ` Victor Do Nascimento
  2024-05-16 11:11     ` Nick Clifton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Victor Do Nascimento @ 2024-05-15 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Clifton, binutils; +Cc: richard.earnshaw

Hey Nick,

It's just been brought to my attention that this seems like an issue 
serious enough to make it worth backporting to binutils 2.42.

Would you object to the backporting of this patch accordingly?

Cheers!

On 4/17/24 10:48, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Victor,
> 
>> Bug: https://sourceware.org/PR31595
>> ---
>>   .../testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.d  |  1 +
>>   .../testsuite/binutils-all/aarch64/illegal.s  |  3 +
>>   include/opcode/aarch64.h                      |  3 +
>>   opcodes/aarch64-dis.c                         | 98 +++++++++++++++----
> 
> Approved - please apply - and thanks for fixing this! :-)
> 
> Cheers
>    Nick
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders [PR31595]
  2024-05-15 14:58   ` Victor Do Nascimento
@ 2024-05-16 11:11     ` Nick Clifton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-05-16 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Victor Do Nascimento, binutils; +Cc: richard.earnshaw

Hi Victor,

> It's just been brought to my attention that this seems like an issue serious enough to make it worth backporting to binutils 2.42.
> 
> Would you object to the backporting of this patch accordingly?

Done. :-)

Cheers
   Nick


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-16 11:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-17  9:44 [PATCH] aarch64: Remove asserts from operand qualifier decoders [PR31595] Victor Do Nascimento
2024-04-17  9:48 ` Nick Clifton
2024-05-15 14:58   ` Victor Do Nascimento
2024-05-16 11:11     ` Nick Clifton
2024-04-18  9:50 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).