From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DF823858D1E for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:54:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1672746887; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7IWV0SIblmfjVeFhxz7kuRPar4LVGMx/SzAzTKupIHE=; b=fkCOvnUzynLol5VVUXxBQ3J4cjX0kvQkn3UUthSDcK5/NfT+JXmE9fbJPX4wXy9yGKjeqI hxhypNp0u/qt2aWT6AczbSSb+QtFWhg6UpbxoQoY8F9hmiDrBUihXLC++d5CmSYRhNX8ZO wfoNIn4bP4KxTqb5Zs1EKCN+Of2dunA= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-281-3zDAM_-6O1aFfwBlITgF4w-1; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 06:54:46 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 3zDAM_-6O1aFfwBlITgF4w-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id r21-20020adfb1d5000000b0026e4c198a43so3635535wra.20 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 03:54:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7IWV0SIblmfjVeFhxz7kuRPar4LVGMx/SzAzTKupIHE=; b=eI/7dVwRebwYz+k98wKvgetvA9+Rz+mdXuuycOKGQGw1db1LAjcQoLr902Vf2fRJgG RQp0EqzqsRnyrzY6I95IWkgw8ZLF1Iw8ZCCzt2zl3t7CMVOIb6kIOmBNqauMsVsxyq9S zSj6c9eAYYhRPRnQJTxpzaFRcwWXpcHeiKeMBvkvWojKznlArEmlAX/+ZnwXF4LI3ZuC zvPT/oWcVkY3jo+Uqz45QtQTPg/TMLz+QdJ7zhIF8b4+bkfxjf9KZyM0H9if/siz5e7d 5Jh3lfy6VmR0qH4ra1v5DYkw1p/XBkEz4Nz8gofHv/jCSWWY045rPZxahIIPAhiW0lLc 6ayQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krWBy8a8VEAfHlDhIDMSFNlFoCzX5LS6WFSes1use9XdMtFxlwQ 4suo3ik5zIa9ebNRpwVaJx7T1YatYXDHaeRABdh5y0pDhJuuPakNENhZmOG8Bcsu4oPH0tPqtD3 CTxv0RLmQiiSh5qHpjg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b95:b0:3d9:baf2:315b with SMTP id n21-20020a05600c3b9500b003d9baf2315bmr3344128wms.11.1672746884547; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 03:54:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtHxVmkJl++36cXoZe1CINb3wcVwkBMB51oSLjbvEZoh49jwypJkjYplGRfKKFYEpxHBwjJwA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b95:b0:3d9:baf2:315b with SMTP id n21-20020a05600c3b9500b003d9baf2315bmr3344117wms.11.1672746884390; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 03:54:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([79.123.75.206]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15-20020a05600c4fcf00b003c6f3f6675bsm50476910wmq.26.2023.01.03.03.54.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jan 2023 03:54:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:54:43 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ld: Rename aarch64pe emulation target to arm64pe To: Mark Harmstone , wej22007@outlook.com, zac.walker@linaro.org, tamar.christina@arm.com, binutils@sourceware.org References: <20221230024055.31841-1-mark@harmstone.com> From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: <20221230024055.31841-1-mark@harmstone.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Mark, > * The aarch64pe emulation target is renamed to arm64pe. This is the name > that LLVM is already using, even though as a rule we call this arch aarch64. > Without this clang won't work with ld. Another possibility would be to > change the -m parameter if it's "arm64", but that seems to me like it's > making things more complicated than they need to be. Agreed - but I think that you need to add a comment to arm64pe.sh explaining why that name has been chosen. This should prevent future users from submitting bug reports asking for it to be changed back... Patch series approved - please apply - mainline only. Cheers Nick