From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-68301-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3699 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2010 14:36:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 3590 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Oct 2010 14:36:35 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:36:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 4819 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 14:36:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tp.orcam.me.uk) (macro@127.0.0.2)  by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 29 Oct 2010 14:36:29 -0000
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:36:00 -0000
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
To: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
cc: Catherine Moore <clm@codesourcery.com>, binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 0.0/4 v2] GAS symbol/label annotation
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1007240320070.29495@tp.orcam.me.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1010290945190.25860@tp.orcam.me.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1007240320070.29495@tp.orcam.me.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00508.txt.bz2

Hi,

 While testing microMIPS changes I have noticed several problems with 
microMIPS symbols/labels related to symbol annotation, the special "dot" 
symbol and relaxation.  As some of these problems apply to MIPS16 or 
generic code I have split these changes off and I am submitting them 
separately.  The corresponding microMIPS changes will be included with the 
actual microMIPS patch.  All these problems are covered by the 
"branch-self" testcase included with the last patch in this series.

 This is the second revision of all the changes originally submitted in 
July, taking your concerns as well any issues I have meanwhile discovered 
myself into account.  As originally, I will be commenting on each patch 
separately with the corresponding submission.

 All these changes have passed regression testing on mips-sde-elf and 
mips-linux-gnu targets, as well as -- because of the generic nature of 
some of these changes -- on an arbitrarily chosen limited selection of 
i686-elf, m68k-elf and powerpc-linux-gnu targets.

  Maciej