From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9024 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2012 15:07:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 9005 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Sep 2012 15:07:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:07:07 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1T8YEz-0002QJ-Sl from Maciej_Rozycki@mentor.com ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:07:05 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 08:07:05 -0700 Received: from [172.30.7.132] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:07:03 +0100 Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:07:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Tristan Gingold CC: binutils Development Subject: Re: Release 2.23: Ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <2E74490B-BCE6-4D8E-A6F1-737A1625DAA4@adacore.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > Did I miss anything? > > At least the snapshot announcement: > > > > > I have just created the 2.23 branch and uploded prerelease 2.22.90 at: > > ftp://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.22.90.tar.bz2 Umm... > The branch was created in July, so you need to backport all these patches. > I can take care of that, providing you sent me the url of the > binutils-cvs@ messages. Hmm, I would like to get included at least these: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-07/msg00139.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00002.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00006.html (I suggest combining the above three into one; non-MIPS clean-ups from the second can be discarded as far as I'm concerned) http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00027.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00028.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00029.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00030.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00044.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00049.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00050.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00084.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00085.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00091.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00092.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00190.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00191.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00209.html and these would be good to have too: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00045.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00046.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00047.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00051.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00052.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00069.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00086.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00093.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00106.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00192.html the latters including in particular test suite coverage for some of the changes from the first set (unfortunately the dependencies require pulling much more than the minimal required set). I've dropped some minor updates that I made in that period. Overall I worked on the submissions in the first half of August with the explicit intent to have them included in 2.23, sigh... Thanks for your offer WRT applying these -- do you have any way to process these messages automatically? Otherwise it might perhaps be easier if I replayed the original commits on binutils-2_23-branch from the original patches. WDYT? Maciej