From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4485 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2014 17:43:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4462 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jun 2014 17:43:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:43:53 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1WsFE5-0002EX-Bj from Maciej_Rozycki@mentor.com ; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:43:49 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.106]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:43:49 -0700 Received: from localhost (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:43:46 +0100 Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:43:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Joel Brobecker CC: , , Alan Modra , Hans-Peter Nilsson , Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [RFA v2] Make it easy to make --disable-werror the default for both binutils and gdb In-Reply-To: <20140604125541.GT4289@adacore.com> Message-ID: References: <1401811030-22706-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20140604125541.GT4289@adacore.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I think Hans-Peter's suggestion was the other way round, its "&&" that is > > portable while "-a" is likely not to work with non-GNU `test' or with > > plain Bourne shells (where it is a builtin). This is what the autoconf > > manual has to say about it in its portability section: > > Hmmm, I see. Thanks for theh clarification. > > I propose the following: Keep the patch I propose as is for now, as it > does not make things worse, and also keep things consistent. And then > follow that up with a patch which switches the operators, all of them, > to using &&. Well, if that's a preexisting problem (I wasn't aware of that), then sure, I have no objections. Maciej