From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62173 invoked by alias); 17 May 2016 14:17:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 62160 invoked by uid 89); 17 May 2016 14:17:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Sure X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2016 14:17:21 +0000 Received: from hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org (unknown [10.100.10.20]) by Websense Email with ESMTPS id B1A395DFAD691; Tue, 17 May 2016 15:17:15 +0100 (IST) Received: from [10.20.78.220] (10.20.78.220) by hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org (10.100.10.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.266.1; Tue, 17 May 2016 15:17:18 +0100 Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 14:17:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Nick Clifton CC: Subject: Re: New ld failure with STB_GNU_UNIQUE patch In-Reply-To: <8760ucpz4e.fsf@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <8760ucpz4e.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2 On Tue, 17 May 2016, Nick Clifton wrote: > I have encountered a new failure in the LD tests for the ft32-elf > target: > > Executing on host: sh -c {./ld-new -L/work/sources/binutils/current/ld/testsuite/ld-unique -r -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300) > spawn [open ...] > ./ld-new: invalid length for memory region flash > failed with: <./ld-new: invalid length for memory region flash>, no expected output > ./ld-new: invalid length for memory region flash > FAIL: Linker setting GNU OSABI on STB_GNU_UNIQUE symbol (PR 10549) > > Would you mind having a look at this please ? Sure, I'll add `ft32-elf' to my regular testing for generic changes too. Maciej