From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17269 invoked by alias); 18 May 2016 09:16:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17259 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2016 09:16:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Great X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:16:48 +0000 Received: from hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org (unknown [10.100.10.20]) by Websense Email with ESMTPS id A9FB525AFA16E; Wed, 18 May 2016 10:16:43 +0100 (IST) Received: from [10.20.78.229] (10.20.78.229) by hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org (10.100.10.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.266.1; Wed, 18 May 2016 10:16:45 +0100 Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 09:16:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Nick Clifton CC: Subject: Re: New ld failure with STB_GNU_UNIQUE patch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <8760ucpz4e.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 Hi Nick, > I am going to check in the patch below to address this problem, and several > others in connection with the FT32 target and linker tests. Great, thanks! One minor nit below. diff --git a/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp b/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp index d2ece76..07ed747 100644 --- a/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp +++ b/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp @@ -1719,6 +1719,7 @@ proc check_shared_lib_support { } { && ![istarget dlx-*-*] && ![istarget epiphany-*-*] && ![istarget fr30-*-*] + && ![istarget ft32-*-*] && ![istarget frv-*-*] && ![istarget h8300-*-*] && ![istarget i860-*-*] My pedantic side says the new entry ought to come after `frv-*-*' actually. Maciej