* [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes
@ 2017-04-24 19:12 Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ELF/BFD: Limit `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call in section GC Maciej W. Rozycki
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2017-04-24 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Modra; +Cc: James Cowgill, binutils
Alan,
As promised here is a mini patch series to address issues with calling
`_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms'. See the individual descriptions for
details.
Please review.
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] ELF/BFD: Limit `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call in section GC
2017-04-24 19:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2017-04-24 19:13 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-26 21:38 ` [committed 2.28 " Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PR ld/21334: Always call `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' if required Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-26 8:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes Alan Modra
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2017-04-24 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Modra; +Cc: James Cowgill, binutils
Consistently call `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' only if linking a
dynamic binary, complementing code in `bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr'
and commit ccabcbe51e85 ("New attempt at fixing MIPS --gc-sections et
al."), <https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-08/msg00258.html>.
bfd/
* elflink.c (bfd_elf_size_dynamic_sections): Only call
`_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' after section GC if dynamic
sections have been created.
---
No regressions across the usual targets. OK for master and 2.28?
Maciej
binutils-bfd-elf-gc-dynsym-renumber.diff
Index: binutils/bfd/elflink.c
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elflink.c 2017-04-22 03:35:18.929206015 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elflink.c 2017-04-22 03:36:05.768357914 +0100
@@ -6460,7 +6460,8 @@ bfd_elf_size_dynamic_sections (bfd *outp
elf_link_hash_traverse (elf_hash_table (info), elf_gc_sweep_symbol,
&sweep_info);
- _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (output_bfd, info, §ion_sym_count);
+ if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created)
+ _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (output_bfd, info, §ion_sym_count);
}
/* Any syms created from now on start with -1 in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] PR ld/21334: Always call `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' if required
2017-04-24 19:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ELF/BFD: Limit `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call in section GC Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2017-04-24 19:16 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-26 21:39 ` [committed 2.28 " Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-26 8:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes Alan Modra
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2017-04-24 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Modra; +Cc: James Cowgill, binutils
Complement commit e17b0c351f0b ("MIPS/BFD: Respect the ELF gABI dynamic
symbol table sort requirement") and correct an inconsistency in dynamic
symbol accounting data causing an assertion failure in the MIPS backend:
ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.28.51.20170330 assertion fail
../../binutils-gdb/bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3860
in the course of making a GOT entry in a static binary to satisfy a GOT
relocation present in input, due to the local dynamic symbol count not
having been established.
To do so let backends request `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' to be
always called, rather than where a dynamic binary is linked only, and
then make this request in the MIPS backend.
bfd/
PR ld/21334
* elf-bfd.h (elf_backend_data): Add `always_renumber_dynsyms'
member.
* elfxx-target.h [!elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms]
(elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms): Define.
(elfNN_bed): Initialize `always_renumber_dynsyms' member.
* elfxx-mips.h (elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms): Define.
* elflink.c (bfd_elf_size_dynamic_sections): Also call
`_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' if the backend has requested
it.
(bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr): Likewise.
ld/
PR ld/21334
* testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.dd: New test.
* testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.gd: New test.
* testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.ld: New test linker script.
* testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.s: New test source.
* testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp: Run the new tests.
---
No regressions against the usual targets. OK for master and 2.28?
Maciej
binutils-bfd-elf-always-dynsym-renumber.diff
Index: binutils/bfd/elf-bfd.h
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2017-04-22 23:56:47.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2017-04-23 00:14:37.913585456 +0100
@@ -1529,6 +1529,10 @@ struct elf_backend_data
/* Address of protected data defined in the shared library may be
external, i.e., due to copy relocation. */
unsigned extern_protected_data : 1;
+
+ /* True if `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' must be called even for
+ static binaries. */
+ unsigned always_renumber_dynsyms : 1;
};
/* Information about reloc sections associated with a bfd_elf_section_data
Index: binutils/bfd/elflink.c
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elflink.c 2017-04-22 23:56:47.773080252 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elflink.c 2017-04-23 01:13:04.711393021 +0100
@@ -6460,7 +6460,11 @@ bfd_elf_size_dynamic_sections (bfd *outp
elf_link_hash_traverse (elf_hash_table (info), elf_gc_sweep_symbol,
&sweep_info);
- if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created)
+ /* We need to reassign dynsym indices now that symbols may have
+ been removed. See the call in `bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr'
+ for the details of the conditions used here. */
+ if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created
+ || bed->always_renumber_dynsyms)
_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (output_bfd, info, §ion_sym_count);
}
@@ -6828,6 +6832,8 @@ bfd_boolean
bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr (bfd *output_bfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
{
const struct elf_backend_data *bed;
+ unsigned long section_sym_count;
+ bfd_size_type dynsymcount;
if (!is_elf_hash_table (info->hash))
return TRUE;
@@ -6835,24 +6841,30 @@ bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr (bfd *ou
bed = get_elf_backend_data (output_bfd);
(*bed->elf_backend_init_index_section) (output_bfd, info);
+ /* Assign dynsym indices. In a shared library we generate a section
+ symbol for each output section, which come first. Next come all
+ of the back-end allocated local dynamic syms, followed by the rest
+ of the global symbols.
+
+ This is usually not needed for static binaries, however backends
+ can request to always do it, e.g. the MIPS backend uses dynamic
+ symbol counts to lay out GOT, which will be produced in the
+ presence of GOT relocations even in static binaries (holding fixed
+ data in that case, to satisfy those relocations). */
+
+ if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created
+ || bed->always_renumber_dynsyms)
+ dynsymcount = _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (output_bfd, info,
+ §ion_sym_count);
+
if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created)
{
bfd *dynobj;
asection *s;
- bfd_size_type dynsymcount;
- unsigned long section_sym_count;
unsigned int dtagcount;
dynobj = elf_hash_table (info)->dynobj;
- /* Assign dynsym indicies. In a shared library we generate a
- section symbol for each output section, which come first.
- Next come all of the back-end allocated local dynamic syms,
- followed by the rest of the global symbols. */
-
- dynsymcount = _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (output_bfd, info,
- §ion_sym_count);
-
/* Work out the size of the symbol version section. */
s = bfd_get_linker_section (dynobj, ".gnu.version");
BFD_ASSERT (s != NULL);
Index: binutils/bfd/elfxx-mips.h
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elfxx-mips.h 2017-04-07 05:01:49.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elfxx-mips.h 2017-04-23 00:24:52.251311219 +0100
@@ -194,3 +194,4 @@ literal_reloc_p (int r_type)
#define elf_backend_post_process_headers _bfd_mips_post_process_headers
#define elf_backend_compact_eh_encoding _bfd_mips_elf_compact_eh_encoding
#define elf_backend_cant_unwind_opcode _bfd_mips_elf_cant_unwind_opcode
+#define elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms TRUE
Index: binutils/bfd/elfxx-target.h
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elfxx-target.h 2017-04-05 23:25:45.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elfxx-target.h 2017-04-23 01:14:47.075873573 +0100
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@
#ifndef elf_backend_extern_protected_data
#define elf_backend_extern_protected_data 0
#endif
+#ifndef elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms
+#define elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms FALSE
+#endif
#ifndef elf_backend_stack_align
#define elf_backend_stack_align 16
#endif
@@ -878,7 +881,8 @@ static struct elf_backend_data elfNN_bed
elf_backend_no_page_alias,
elf_backend_default_execstack,
elf_backend_caches_rawsize,
- elf_backend_extern_protected_data
+ elf_backend_extern_protected_data,
+ elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms
};
/* Forward declaration for use when initialising alternative_target field. */
Index: binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp 2017-04-22 23:56:47.811605508 +0100
+++ binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp 2017-04-22 23:58:50.694492097 +0100
@@ -1129,3 +1129,13 @@ if { $linux_gnu } {
"export-$class-ref"]]
}
}
+
+# PR ld/21334 GOT relocation in static binary test.
+run_ld_link_tests [list \
+ [list \
+ "PR ld/21233 MIPS GOT16 relocation in static binary" \
+ "$abi_ldflags(o32) -e foo -T pr21334.ld" "" "$abi_asflags(o32)" \
+ {pr21334.s} \
+ {{objdump {-d --prefix-addresses} pr21334.dd} \
+ {readelf -A pr21334.gd}} \
+ "pr21334"]]
Index: binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.dd
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.dd 2017-04-22 23:58:50.711717195 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+.*: +file format .*mips.*
+
+Disassembly of section \.text:
+[0-9a-f]+ <[^>]*> lui gp,0x1
+[0-9a-f]+ <[^>]*> addiu gp,gp,-32736
+[0-9a-f]+ <[^>]*> addu gp,gp,t9
+[0-9a-f]+ <[^>]*> lw v0,-32744\(gp\)
+[0-9a-f]+ <[^>]*> jr ra
+[0-9a-f]+ <[^>]*> addiu v0,v0,4
+ \.\.\.
Index: binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.gd
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.gd 2017-04-22 23:58:50.731964110 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+Static GOT:
+ Canonical gp value: 00008020
+
+ Reserved entries:
+ Address Access Value
+ 00000030 -32752\(gp\) 00000000
+ 00000034 -32748\(gp\) 80000000
+
+ Local entries:
+ Address Access Value
+ 00000038 -32744\(gp\) 00000000
Index: binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.ld
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.ld 2017-04-22 23:58:50.744037369 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+SECTIONS
+{
+ .text : { *(.text) }
+ HIDDEN (_gp = ALIGN (16) + 0x7ff0);
+ .got : { *(.got) }
+ .symtab : { *(.symtab) }
+ .strtab : { *(.strtab) }
+ /DISCARD/ : { *(*) }
+}
Index: binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.s
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.s 2017-04-22 23:58:50.746054019 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+ .abicalls
+ .text
+ .set noreorder
+ .globl foo
+ .ent foo
+foo:
+ .frame $sp, 0, $31
+ .mask 0x00000000, 0
+ .fmask 0x00000000, 0
+ .cpload $25
+ lw $2, %got(bar)($28)
+ jr $31
+ addiu $2, $2, 4
+ .end foo
+ .weak bar
+ .hidden bar
+
+# Force some (non-delay-slot) zero bytes, to make 'objdump' print ...
+ .align 4, 0
+ .space 16
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes
2017-04-24 19:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ELF/BFD: Limit `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call in section GC Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PR ld/21334: Always call `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' if required Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2017-04-26 8:22 ` Alan Modra
2017-04-26 12:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alan Modra @ 2017-04-26 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej W. Rozycki; +Cc: James Cowgill, binutils
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:12:28PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> As promised here is a mini patch series to address issues with calling
> `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms'. See the individual descriptions for
> details.
OK for both patches, thanks.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes
2017-04-26 8:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes Alan Modra
@ 2017-04-26 12:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-26 21:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2017-04-26 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Modra; +Cc: James Cowgill, binutils
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Alan Modra wrote:
> > As promised here is a mini patch series to address issues with calling
> > `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms'. See the individual descriptions for
> > details.
>
> OK for both patches, thanks.
Committed, thanks.
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [committed 2.28 1/2] ELF/BFD: Limit `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call in section GC
2017-04-24 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ELF/BFD: Limit `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call in section GC Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2017-04-26 21:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2017-04-26 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Modra; +Cc: James Cowgill, binutils
Consistently call `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' only if linking a
dynamic binary, complementing code in `bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr'
and commit ccabcbe51e85 ("New attempt at fixing MIPS --gc-sections et
al."), <https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-08/msg00258.html>.
bfd/
* elflink.c (elf_gc_sweep): Only call
`_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' if dynamic sections have been
created.
(backported from commit c46cec3a8cfe02fbe0f6c67ba53abc5369c5c659)
---
No regressions across the usual targets. Committed to 2.28.
Maciej
binutils-bfd-elf-gc-dynsym-renumber-2.28.diff
Index: binutils/bfd/elflink.c
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elflink.c 2017-04-26 13:50:04.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elflink.c 2017-04-26 13:56:16.393714349 +0100
@@ -12983,7 +12983,8 @@ elf_gc_sweep (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link
elf_link_hash_traverse (elf_hash_table (info), elf_gc_sweep_symbol,
&sweep_info);
- _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (abfd, info, §ion_sym_count);
+ if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created)
+ _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (abfd, info, §ion_sym_count);
return TRUE;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [committed 2.28 2/2] PR ld/21334: Always call `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' if required
2017-04-24 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PR ld/21334: Always call `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' if required Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2017-04-26 21:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2017-04-26 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Modra; +Cc: James Cowgill, binutils
Complement commit e17b0c351f0b ("MIPS/BFD: Respect the ELF gABI dynamic
symbol table sort requirement") and correct an inconsistency in dynamic
symbol accounting data causing an assertion failure in the MIPS backend:
ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.28.51.20170330 assertion fail
../../binutils-gdb/bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3860
in the course of making a GOT entry in a static binary to satisfy a GOT
relocation present in input, due to the local dynamic symbol count not
having been established.
To do so let backends request `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' to be
always called, rather than where a dynamic binary is linked only, and
then make this request in the MIPS backend.
bfd/
PR ld/21334
* elf-bfd.h (elf_backend_data): Add `always_renumber_dynsyms'
member.
* elfxx-target.h [!elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms]
(elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms): Define.
(elfNN_bed): Initialize `always_renumber_dynsyms' member.
* elfxx-mips.h (elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms): Define.
* elflink.c (bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr): Also call
`_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' if the backend has requested
it.
(elf_gc_sweep): Likewise.
(backported from commit 23ec1e32b1ab714649a7c25e49b5d721fe3bd3db)
---
No regressions against the usual targets. Committed to 2.28.
Maciej
binutils-bfd-elf-always-dynsym-renumber-2.28.diff
Index: binutils/bfd/elf-bfd.h
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2017-04-26 13:46:32.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2017-04-26 13:59:01.977164246 +0100
@@ -1478,6 +1478,10 @@ struct elf_backend_data
/* Address of protected data defined in the shared library may be
external, i.e., due to copy relocation. */
unsigned extern_protected_data : 1;
+
+ /* True if `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' must be called even for
+ static binaries. */
+ unsigned always_renumber_dynsyms : 1;
};
/* Information about reloc sections associated with a bfd_elf_section_data
Index: binutils/bfd/elflink.c
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elflink.c 2017-04-26 13:56:16.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elflink.c 2017-04-26 13:59:01.995374303 +0100
@@ -6707,6 +6707,8 @@ bfd_boolean
bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr (bfd *output_bfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
{
const struct elf_backend_data *bed;
+ unsigned long section_sym_count;
+ bfd_size_type dynsymcount;
if (!is_elf_hash_table (info->hash))
return TRUE;
@@ -6714,24 +6716,30 @@ bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr (bfd *ou
bed = get_elf_backend_data (output_bfd);
(*bed->elf_backend_init_index_section) (output_bfd, info);
+ /* Assign dynsym indices. In a shared library we generate a section
+ symbol for each output section, which come first. Next come all
+ of the back-end allocated local dynamic syms, followed by the rest
+ of the global symbols.
+
+ This is usually not needed for static binaries, however backends
+ can request to always do it, e.g. the MIPS backend uses dynamic
+ symbol counts to lay out GOT, which will be produced in the
+ presence of GOT relocations even in static binaries (holding fixed
+ data in that case, to satisfy those relocations). */
+
+ if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created
+ || bed->always_renumber_dynsyms)
+ dynsymcount = _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (output_bfd, info,
+ §ion_sym_count);
+
if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created)
{
bfd *dynobj;
asection *s;
- bfd_size_type dynsymcount;
- unsigned long section_sym_count;
unsigned int dtagcount;
dynobj = elf_hash_table (info)->dynobj;
- /* Assign dynsym indicies. In a shared library we generate a
- section symbol for each output section, which come first.
- Next come all of the back-end allocated local dynamic syms,
- followed by the rest of the global symbols. */
-
- dynsymcount = _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (output_bfd, info,
- §ion_sym_count);
-
/* Work out the size of the symbol version section. */
s = bfd_get_linker_section (dynobj, ".gnu.version");
BFD_ASSERT (s != NULL);
@@ -12983,7 +12991,11 @@ elf_gc_sweep (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link
elf_link_hash_traverse (elf_hash_table (info), elf_gc_sweep_symbol,
&sweep_info);
- if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created)
+ /* We need to reassign dynsym indices now that symbols may have
+ been removed. See the call in `bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr'
+ for the details of the conditions used here. */
+ if (elf_hash_table (info)->dynamic_sections_created
+ || bed->always_renumber_dynsyms)
_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms (abfd, info, §ion_sym_count);
return TRUE;
}
Index: binutils/bfd/elfxx-mips.h
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elfxx-mips.h 2017-04-26 13:46:34.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elfxx-mips.h 2017-04-26 13:59:02.001414621 +0100
@@ -196,3 +196,4 @@ literal_reloc_p (int r_type)
#define elf_backend_post_process_headers _bfd_mips_post_process_headers
#define elf_backend_compact_eh_encoding _bfd_mips_elf_compact_eh_encoding
#define elf_backend_cant_unwind_opcode _bfd_mips_elf_cant_unwind_opcode
+#define elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms TRUE
Index: binutils/bfd/elfxx-target.h
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elfxx-target.h 2017-04-26 13:46:34.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/elfxx-target.h 2017-04-26 13:59:02.008468206 +0100
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@
#ifndef elf_backend_extern_protected_data
#define elf_backend_extern_protected_data 0
#endif
+#ifndef elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms
+#define elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms FALSE
+#endif
#ifndef elf_backend_stack_align
#define elf_backend_stack_align 16
#endif
@@ -866,7 +869,8 @@ static struct elf_backend_data elfNN_bed
elf_backend_no_page_alias,
elf_backend_default_execstack,
elf_backend_caches_rawsize,
- elf_backend_extern_protected_data
+ elf_backend_extern_protected_data,
+ elf_backend_always_renumber_dynsyms
};
/* Forward declaration for use when initialising alternative_target field. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes
2017-04-26 12:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2017-04-26 21:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2017-04-26 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Modra; +Cc: James Cowgill, binutils
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > > As promised here is a mini patch series to address issues with calling
> > > `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms'. See the individual descriptions for
> > > details.
> >
> > OK for both patches, thanks.
>
> Committed, thanks.
And now backported to 2.28, after an additional test cycle due to the
changes being more than just a mechanical patch merge. Final patches
posted for documentation purposes, for the same reason, and PR ld/21334
now closed.
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-26 21:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-24 19:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ELF/BFD: Limit `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call in section GC Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-26 21:38 ` [committed 2.28 " Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PR ld/21334: Always call `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' if required Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-26 21:39 ` [committed 2.28 " Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-26 8:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PR ld/21334: `_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms' call fixes Alan Modra
2017-04-26 12:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-26 21:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).