From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82489 invoked by alias); 19 May 2017 15:01:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 82315 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2017 15:00:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:557 X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2017 15:00:54 +0000 Received: from hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org (unknown [10.100.10.20]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 37D7ED36357F9; Fri, 19 May 2017 16:00:47 +0100 (IST) Received: from [10.20.78.42] (10.20.78.42) by hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org (10.100.10.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Fri, 19 May 2017 16:00:49 +0100 Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:47:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: "Jose E. Marchesi" CC: Alan Modra , Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS/BFD: For n64 hold the number of internal relocs in `->reloc_count' In-Reply-To: <87a868di4e.fsf@oracle.com> Message-ID: References: <1493986217-9037-1-git-send-email-jose.marchesi@oracle.com> <1493986217-9037-4-git-send-email-jose.marchesi@oracle.com> <87h90jo3zo.fsf@oracle.com> <87a868di4e.fsf@oracle.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 On Fri, 19 May 2017, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > You may want to review your other changes already committed and see if > there's anything that has become unneeded now that your MIPS change is no > longer required. That'll depend on what the SPARC part needs. Of course > your `objdump' update will still be needed for the said part. > > I assume you mean `objcopy'. Yeah, I will remove the workaround as soon > as a mips64 fix gets in. Indeed `objcopy', sorry. Maciej