From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=F3Zg=BU=orcam.me.uk=macro@sourceware.org>
Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863B43858D20
	for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:09:14 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 863B43858D20
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orcam.me.uk
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=orcam.me.uk
Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id CC3CA92009C; Wed, 31 May 2023 13:09:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60C992009B;
	Wed, 31 May 2023 12:09:13 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 12:09:13 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
To: YunQiang Su <syq@debian.org>
cc: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>, YunQiang Su <yunqiang.su@cipunited.com>, 
    binutils@sourceware.org, xry111@xry111.site, richard.sandiford@arm.com, 
    jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Some MIPS changes and testsuite fixes
In-Reply-To: <CAKcpw6V8zJjwnX9C8Z1xf4wQ=Jc7sUKrnRYEdBCv=R1Ho7==yg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2305311208250.14435@angie.orcam.me.uk>
References: <20230516025426.2334478-1-yunqiang.su@cipunited.com> <ZGQQfi0oHT0YTyAp@squeak.grove.modra.org> <CAKcpw6V8zJjwnX9C8Z1xf4wQ=Jc7sUKrnRYEdBCv=R1Ho7==yg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3488.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>

On Wed, 31 May 2023, YunQiang Su wrote:

> > I applied your patchset and ran my usual regression tests over some
> > 165 different binutils targets.  mipsisa32r2el-elf, mips-sgi-irix6,
> > and mipstx39-elf show some new failures.  This doesn't mean I
> > disapprove the patch, in fact I like it!  Please don't think you must
> > post another version of the patchset to fix these problems.  It might
> > be better to solve them with an incremental patch, giving the mips
> > maintainers a chance to review this patchset first.
> 
> If there is no objection, I will commit this patchset and go on to solve
> the problem Alan pointed out.

 Well, it does have to be reviewed, especially as there are changes beyond 
just testsuite fixes.

  Maciej