From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2826385700C for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:43:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E2826385700C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orcam.me.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=orcam.me.uk Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5629F92009C; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:43:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FAB92009B; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:43:14 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:43:14 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Nick Clifton cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New failures for the mips64el-openbsd target In-Reply-To: <87zg51m295.fsf@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <87zg51m295.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3488.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Nick, > I do not know if these are related to your recent gas testuite fix > (2b462da34de977f953a778afa0cb55e3286ece3d), but would you mind > checking please ? If you cannot reproduce the problems, then it is > probably an issue at my end - maybe I need to rerun the configure > script or something like that - and I will investigate some more. It may well be that one of the YunQiang Su's patches I have reverted brough these back; a regression from his earlier commit(s) anyway. I haven't run any verification on the reverts as I don't think there is any excuse for violating our policies and committing patches with no prior approval and/or with objections raised. I think let's wait and see how YunQiang handles it, and if it turns out to be a failure, then I'll handle it one way or another (maybe his earlier commits need to be reverted too). NB YunQiang has been around long enough to know what our policies are and what the requirements are for good patch submissions. Conversely the Sony Allegrex support was submitted by a newcomer and it was a perfect example of how a good submission looks like. Sure it wasn't perfect, there were a couple of minor issues, but it was made with due dilligence and it was a pleasure to review. So it's not that it cannot be done. FWIW, Maciej