public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
To: YunQiang Su <syq@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
	binutils@sourceware.org,  xry111@xry111.site
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] MIPS/Gas: Disallow branch to absolute address for PIC
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:03:27 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2402071053210.2376@angie.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKcpw6Xc3ADVpujk0xU67dygE2fgxyAz5ekeGDum5HmYUS7xcA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 7 Feb 2024, YunQiang Su wrote:

> >  NAK, `mips_pic' may be set to SVR4_PIC and still produce de facto non-PIC
> > code, as per the original SVR4 MIPS ABI (with lazy binding stubs rather
> > than PLT).  We continue supporting this mode.
> >
> >  Originally NO_PIC was intended for bare metal code only, statically
> > linked only, which was later extended to Linux, etc. with the addition of
> > PLT and copy reloc support.
> >
> >  PR31343 has to be sorted in the linker.
> >
> 
> So, what's the expected behavior?

 The static linker is supposed to report, as a warning or an error 
(depending on what BFD's policy is), that it cannot resolve a relocation, 
either due to an overflow or due to the inability to emit a suitable 
dynamic relocation so as to defer the calculation to the dynamic loader.

> Let's use the example:
>         .set noreorder
>         .set nomicromips
>         .set nomips16
>         b    (4)
>         INSN0
>         INSN1
>         INSN2
>         INSN3
> 
> At least we have 2 choice:
> 1. jump to INSN0, if we treat (4) same with (. + 4).
> 2. jump to INSN1, if we treat (4) as the offset in ISA document:
>     "An 18-bit signed offset (the 16-bit offset field shifted left 2
> bits) is added
>      to the address of the instruction following the branch (not the
> branch itself),
>      in the branch delay slot, to form a PC-relative effective target address."
> 
> Currently, this syntax is not supported by ld even for static at all:
> 
> xx:
>       b (8)
>       ssnop
>       ssnop
>       ssnop
>       ssnop
> 
> mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc -mno-shared -mno-abicalls -static -nostdlib 1.s
> warning: cannot find entry symbol __start; defaulting to 00400110
> /tmp/ccdHuq6V.o: in function `xx':
> (.text+0x0): relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_PC16 against `*UND*'

 I gave valid use examples in PR31343 that link correctly.  I can image a 
tiny bare-metal app using branches to hardcoded locations for one reason 
or another.  Tools ought not to stand in the way (a general engineering 
principle and one of the GNU project in particular too).

  Maciej

      reply	other threads:[~2024-02-07 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06 17:05 YunQiang Su
2024-02-06 19:20 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-02-07  4:37   ` YunQiang Su
2024-02-07 11:03     ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2402071053210.2376@angie.orcam.me.uk \
    --to=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nickc@redhat.com \
    --cc=syq@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).