From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-109036-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 84356 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2020 18:07:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 84346 invoked by uid 89); 17 Feb 2020 18:07:15 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=composition, MIPS64, H*Ad:U*pinskia
X-HELO: cvs.linux-mips.org
Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org (HELO cvs.linux-mips.org) (148.251.95.138) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:07:14 +0000
Received: (from localhost user: 'macro', uid#1010) by eddie.linux-mips.org        with ESMTP id S23990923AbgBQSHKeBBm- (ORCPT        <rfc822;binutils@sourceware.org>); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:07:10 +0100
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:07:00 -0000
From:   "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
To:     Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me>
cc:     Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,        binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [MIPS] Can we have R_MIPS_PC64?
In-Reply-To: <20200208183958.v4vfdtfstlwtod3p@google.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.2002171758510.2579827@eddie.linux-mips.org>
References: <20200205071944.tberxwpcrkhnat4h@gmail.com> <CA+=Sn1=xg1icO50KHakDCEqc4EcStYZ2zVpC-dAR06+Ppq+Ssw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+=Sn1kWk6AoRfade-_MdqTzvCSKCVSMKNF3cFtZCNQReTB2zQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+=Sn1mcNdGwYwC8Ds2KcNBQ569imyZsjQBFuOTyRsytKKQKXg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+=Sn1=s_vkt=iJXHCn3oLEMv-0=2o5Q3EWvujLox-NGMAK6=g@mail.gmail.com> <20200208183958.v4vfdtfstlwtod3p@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00415.txt.bz2

On Sat, 8 Feb 2020, Fangrui Song wrote:

> I hope someone can add back R_MIPS_PC64.

 You don't need R_MIPS_PC64.  You can yield the same effect the usual 
MIPS64 way, that is by composing R_MIPS_PC32 with R_MIPS_64 (similarly to 
e.g. how R_MIPS_REL32 composes with R_MIPS_64).

 Of course the toolchain may not as it stands support this composition.  
Feel free to post patches to take care of your use case.

 HTH,

  Maciej