From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B1C385AC3C for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:44:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 60B1C385AC3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8538321FF8; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:44:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1666712694; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4ChqHg+tqaETU2Lk84iz54W/RXaAQIYN5TJGG+j2GQc=; b=KT98bMQvu0xPh1MQVTuUAMbAOMv5VCOeXs6UKmyQr4WTQ30AhEnLjktAJaOrw5g6naebp7 gRE4ZRCGUuXGBkStnL3SSJQUKmxtE2Os70Jhlno5MdvtreYTmZeFFE25GYgZuRXrPcn67N kUESvmcB+T/GMIweO1ZGokuYoN5CleY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1666712694; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4ChqHg+tqaETU2Lk84iz54W/RXaAQIYN5TJGG+j2GQc=; b=9j+CKLWxa5DJkBMg6k7VGF8AcORqOzEmdrSpoUIoRBPc1MnLnsoJ0etyjCCo+A/GG6LN+r jGrj1KVOM22gpGDw== Received: from wotan.suse.de (wotan.suse.de [10.160.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B26FC2C141; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wotan.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 10510) id AA18A63BB; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wotan.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E08632C; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:44:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Michael Matz To: Fangrui Song cc: binutils@sourceware.org, "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: x86-64: Use only one default max-page-size In-Reply-To: <20221020173509.rmb55tcejzyczdwr@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20221020173509.rmb55tcejzyczdwr@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hello, On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Fangrui Song wrote: > > > bfd/ > > > * elf64-x86-64.c (ELF_MAXPAGESIZE): Don't depend on > > > DEFAULT_LD_Z_SEPARATE_CODE. > > > > OK. > > > > Thanks. > > Thanks. I like consistent max-page-size=4096 for x86. > > (I'll update > https://maskray.me/blog/2020-11-15-explain-gnu-linker-options "-z > separate-code" when this patch lands.) Now there as a2267dbfc9e1dd955f78561c40f00afa9ddbe619 . Ciao, Michael.