From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66268 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2018 15:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 64643 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jan 2018 15:56:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:542, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:56:29 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE9946663; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.116.141] (ovpn-116-141.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.141]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D481F5C257; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Documentation for .largecomm and friends To: Jan Beulich Cc: "H.J. Lu" , "binutils@sourceware.org" References: <87po7cqauz.fsf@redhat.com> <5A37F8F10200007800198337@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <5A4E5986020000780019B1CC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> From: Nick Clifton Message-ID: Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:56:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5A4E5986020000780019B1CC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 Hi Jan, >> Any objections to this patch for PR 22553 ? > > Sounds plausible, thanks for doing this. What about "and friends" > though? The PR also refers to .lbss, .ldata and .lrodata, but I think that the reporter was mistaken about those. There is a comment in gas/doc/c-i386.texi mentioning that .code16gcc is not documented, and a scan of the code indicates that .secrel32, .operand_check, .sse_check, .disallow_index_reg, and .allow_index_reg are also missing documentation. Cheers Nick