From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-56142-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3712 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2008 23:27:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 32281 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Aug 2008 22:17:06 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.170)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:16:31 +0000
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so1133790wfc.24         for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.215.5 with SMTP id n5mr1159094wfg.27.1218838589874;         Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.169.6 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b609cb3b0808151516y2f53052brf02c7ec6d6191908@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:27:00 -0000
From: NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Next release
Cc: ddaney@avtrex.com, eweddington@cso.atmel.com, gingold@adacore.com,  	binutils@sourceware.org, drow@false.org
In-Reply-To: <20080815.135426.193704618.davem@davemloft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <C37D62D0-4285-4402-ADCA-AEE29D2F99CE@adacore.com> 	 <258DDD1F44B6ED4AAFD4370847CF58D50259E381@csomb01.corp.atmel.com> 	 <48A5AC91.8000301@avtrex.com> 	 <20080815.135426.193704618.davem@davemloft.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2

On 8/15/08, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:19:29 -0700
>
> > My $0.02: Although possible, it would make the release process too
> > cumbersome.  Bugs in any one component would block the release of
> > the entire bundle.  Letting the individual projects progress
> > somewhat independently as they do now allows for more and better
> > releases of all of them.
>
> The corollary could also be argued, in that if the trees were
> integrated then developers would need to be more mindful about
> not adding new regressions in related components.
>

Merging them also makes figuring out what version works with what a
heck of a lot easier.