From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5913858D37 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:55:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BD5913858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1663754125; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=S+Hsv0fGDmekBthMgx30pc1eQDJl2shwLwHbTyJS+w8=; b=OhZe9iUEq1p/mHD3MTK88bayG8h2egvrBJMRWJFKTfbJOAdWBFm80Sl50QeW+UtWuX/0nS JQqmABOlPNH2IkKpT1TIetuD/cVXYLGl9pzoCTuavGRNHmrP7608IEaWA40McpY8+sTv0j 53Dms5cSQlO5azLTJkdGOHfAemRWkTU= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-625-gKimIdZYOSSL2cHkGcF_Bw-1; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 05:55:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gKimIdZYOSSL2cHkGcF_Bw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id i129-20020a1c3b87000000b003b33e6160bdso7662123wma.7 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 02:55:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=S+Hsv0fGDmekBthMgx30pc1eQDJl2shwLwHbTyJS+w8=; b=eSRgMM/wAPQLstQznCcGVYG5tjyHaABTnFtjh5oOZFYzbcrkjQ3BoNhG5zJOD6QX4J D6oRPJgYxgjIOgJFdqDsYxFQ14HhMqIQyRCOLBIl3T8QJOSfYPgP+PwPYhKPXcwdWQ8+ 6Zj7uwl0XHW1pKuy1fAror026+Cmimo+LrQUArRs0fSA8/Ld0LzuIDJk/kjK9E3BIwQv fdSNqvrBjaPxWfI4QcXeaM6UKGpnd5UGWsJ5RonwC3MWFF/DPC+Ri9U2MAtSHEgAXwgy 5nzVPQG7JDuzigaySFj69xEphcFuf82Qs8UNFzykip4SRYDwY1g7fIUVJsKXDg/He+lM vPVg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1WF2LnzOhi4+cPnyRNtTICVkimY+eF3KoiVZaoB1Sju3FBN+m8 qzpjk57nHYZR+dLhmbD60VbzP0tGSMgBlGOnnJ5T0/0PH/BPoUnDV90mPQbiIVeAPzAQUCG7DL2 +mMqH0dgJ+H0zKakuCA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2747:b0:3b4:708a:f66a with SMTP id 7-20020a05600c274700b003b4708af66amr5017039wmw.146.1663754123027; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 02:55:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7dTTR1ugCGtOLfLjXh2EGqkR2JnyvMwedDIJ2eHwc1nmPQ5FMVftNLKBftHkjmd6cawAJWGA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2747:b0:3b4:708a:f66a with SMTP id 7-20020a05600c274700b003b4708af66amr5017026wmw.146.1663754122819; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 02:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([212.126.151.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4-20020a05600c464400b003a3442f1229sm2130180wmo.29.2022.09.21.02.55.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Sep 2022 02:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 10:55:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] bfd, binutils, gas: Remove/mark unused variables To: Tsukasa OI , Jan Beulich Cc: binutils@sourceware.org References: <1ae9efe3-f890-ee6e-11ad-f5045616f253@redhat.com> From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Tsukasa, > Nick and Jan, > > I sincerely apologize that I thought previous "okay" mail from Jan, a > maintainer: > > as an "approval" and applied this patch already. > > I will not merge the patch again unless the word "approve" is used > explicitly. I am really sorry. No - you were correct. Jan's "okay" was an approval. And I should have noticed that and not sent my "approved" email, so I apologise for the confusion. Cheers Nick