From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 120104 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2020 12:17:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 119903 invoked by uid 89); 24 Feb 2020 12:17:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*Ad:U*nickc, HX-Languages-Length:293, H*f:sk:b2983af, H*f:sk:877e0pm X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (205.139.110.61) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:17:02 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582546620; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=xzmLIj/rSrIwYOwBpEzPWlqR5hzUXncJfK002mwVquQ=; b=LQktdOPdSKqacQcMDIe2gOfqazAJfxsoJ8QtInXT2yUHCjnwhVWkwwPFLRkgCUsj3gJJA7 qgiExWdQzWTW4EdrWks+pMAypfeEGgaFOzZGTFMTK/jm5SgJE38TbT03UvSmyZZfKPCoT5 YtLFJU6sAwlFVHdhAQcVdaINFe9fo3M= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-4-TENGPbClMkKxRnuoALfr3w-1; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 07:16:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0248108442D; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.148] (ovpn-117-148.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.148]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB05782063; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: RFC: Supporting multiple relocs per section To: Fangrui Song Cc: Alan Modra , binutils@sourceware.org References: <877e0pmpew.fsf@redhat.com> <20200218002019.GD5570@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20200224063852.2seelvdhlvzhxw53@google.com> From: Nick Clifton Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200224063852.2seelvdhlvzhxw53@google.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00527.txt.bz2 Hi Fangrui, > Where can we find more information about the kernel side implementation, > if it is open? Good question. I believe that it is being used in Fedora, so it should be open. I will ask the kernel team for any pointers. Cheers Nick