From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7EB38618BF for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 06:53:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7F7EB38618BF Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 7F7EB38618BF Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=89.208.246.23 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701759236; cv=none; b=cAbpknoFHf9TnT79Gc9DOc3YHTGsWG2uOYwDrusQSSY8WP8ArpyEoXMGHn51EkbURwHbi5AcTrzCl6NYgOikyf3Biqc4FEBOq98XhLrRyfMGfoFDtt2AvQDAm/ZPYy/C/My/HLgin5ztWdPhbv29v+WXba0ZYSaYIFBinGNnc4I= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701759236; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rFP5MOL6Ua3f+uiuoHQSziFQ7AhBIfMFZq48nd00m2A=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=IF7EVDRMbJyQZf58b6QynIFWoV+3flm2rnGkHC+t72IkTti0M0iPmaId6aiYmc3/moNUnmc0GcycUdzicdjynR/A9fCf418ki34AMeBKj8ZT9SMb/cIziyHv1XmGv3/RjN7pdAUIegfPgo+TLLTIaYj9q2x8eeAihD9SJD426DQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1701748771; bh=rFP5MOL6Ua3f+uiuoHQSziFQ7AhBIfMFZq48nd00m2A=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Llk7yuZRQ4lG/ssAQDd+mKkj4oa2Fc/nFn88uQJmNsI+2mtY19s2hnWLpAwDVrFIu EUqcLfMk8DcpEqo/l68UnXZm9TJZmlSA3Qhz4lNHp885Tbi8SExWwaYVyqLTH5QjuM 9DPEx9QUiuwYv5NnI2dLVbHZsZlDYO7rRrmX20tQ= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8003C66BA3; Mon, 4 Dec 2023 22:59:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] LoongArch: opcodes: Add support for tls le relax. From: Xi Ruoyao To: mengqinggang , changjiachen , binutils@sourceware.org Cc: xuchenghua@loongson.cn, chenglulu@loongson.cn, liuzhensong@loongson.cn, i.swmail@xen0n.name, maskray@google.com, cailulu@loongson.cn, luweining@loongson.cn, wanglei@loongson.cn, hejinyang@loongson.cn, Lazy_Linux@126.com Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 11:59:26 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20231202065334.25904-1-changjiachen@stu.xupt.edu.cn> <20231202065334.25904-4-changjiachen@stu.xupt.edu.cn> <8295edb277bbeae2e5a7e12e1ffb09e33898ba58.camel@xry111.site> Autocrypt: addr=xry111@xry111.site; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 09:36 +0800, mengqinggang wrote: > > You can always write > >=20 > > .reloc 0, R_LARCH_LE_ADD_R, a > > add.d $t0, $t0, $tp >=20 >=20 > We need to set the offset of .reloc, but gcc may not get a accurate offse= t > relative to the section. Sorry, I mean ".reloc ., R_LARCH_LE_ADD_R, a", not ".reloc 0". And if you must go with an additional operand of add.d you should make sure things like "add.d $t0, $t0, $t1, 114" or "add.d $t0, $t0, $t1, %lo12(x)" rejected with a reasonable message (not an internal error, nor an abort, nor silently producing broken binary). --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University