From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB083858C66 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:06:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8EB083858C66 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1695035202; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bHD91mc7TnyJ4CWiB39hMq62cTC6n+U+mnMxnZOiIPI=; b=Tv05blmaSDVNfMpk5Q6MZljO/V65eMFtyuRi+H/UOC1XvyRdsZhAzqlakAYPgLl4SyRBZJ J8xrbhU2XUkVgIrvK/gjJz+o1AJGyOn4ZI69zTY55Puatb1Xa2EjJJ5K0M3HrSKxJYQBU2 9oJp87IBv3OPkLI9/+MX+jpkGR6L4D0= Received: from mail-qt1-f197.google.com (mail-qt1-f197.google.com [209.85.160.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-531-71LMQq9GNUmonbZEs99T1g-1; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 07:06:40 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 71LMQq9GNUmonbZEs99T1g-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f197.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-417992ff7d5so36025211cf.3 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:06:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695035200; x=1695640000; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bHD91mc7TnyJ4CWiB39hMq62cTC6n+U+mnMxnZOiIPI=; b=Cpnsg9pAwR9BK6C8wU+iYr/n5JTHPJlcUVRXwBMgF5PWj+qnn+4kZY2rCsMcbcxRHb X3vdEhiVL1L2wvLjf+PY+J+w+MgevuguVyJ71OkFNnGlxCEKp+KW2VkfBrHonzp5AhI9 oXpT6QTmCaSgVbmS3A0nel0X5ySRMtGEjGTbDteyVuDu32LZI2nbzYTUeLVeWJvEqAL1 AwMJic/OKBkCObNiEAUJ/Emr3LZKAStbRkADUBJfyWLPSpfDr1K22x3Y2evSBP8DYuz5 FfObYvqm8g1+ZW+3Emc1ZKK0CuDDNht9NCqR4XSDHyy0vimGlVmpoj/nPg3aZHI0m8mw 2U/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzGn5IxU35Pv0cV+C/rz6k28lnZpKgOBEUqAZHNXRlqcEjbhGnQ Zsgif3BcVFoph/jmkxRNMfmCyjV0xndFWZjQxA+mcS52jWG44esqQQLsWZC4XKDZUG1wS3NYs6m PMid51pRJ6/5hLo9iuw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:178c:b0:412:2a9a:8a33 with SMTP id s12-20020a05622a178c00b004122a9a8a33mr10788091qtk.3.1695035200445; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:06:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFTQ1rusYVQNG5+KzAW3QNp8oN9/FfRW91qmeLsxSIYIt2+tYqBbA/OeRF1frKYYYerMLIo8A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:178c:b0:412:2a9a:8a33 with SMTP id s12-20020a05622a178c00b004122a9a8a33mr10788081qtk.3.1695035200199; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([80.168.197.243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b11-20020ac8678b000000b003fde3d63d22sm2906923qtp.69.2023.09.18.04.06.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 12:06:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: Use of uninitialized memory To: Jacob Navia , binutils@sourceware.org References: From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Jacob, Thanks for the bug report and detailed analysis. > HOW TO FIX: > 1) Intead of calling XNEW call XCNEW that calls calloc instead of malloc. > This will ensure that the inequality will fail. Agreed, and simple is better as far as I am concerned, so I have checked in this solution. Cheers Nick