From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-39955-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21620 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2005 00:57:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21605 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 00:57:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.200)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 00:57:03 -0000
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1125009wra
        for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.15.76 with SMTP id 76mr1651480wro;
        Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.38.71 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c195ebf705042417577cb6cde3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:57:00 -0000
From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com>
Reply-To: sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com>
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used
In-Reply-To: <d4hero$4p6$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c195ebf70504241112c4e39b4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050424182151.GA15499@lucon.org> <d4gqkc$pud$1@sea.gmane.org>
	 <5460e33305042412557e7e0069@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c195ebf705042413547d664977@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c195ebf7050424140435b84b17@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050424214925.GA18266@lucon.org> <d4hero$4p6$1@sea.gmane.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00655.txt.bz2

On 4/24/05, sean <seandarcy2@gmail.com> wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:04:11PM -0400, sean darcy wrote:
> >
>=20
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D19664
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20218
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20297
> >
> > Then if you still believe it is a binutils bug, please open a bug
> > report at
> >
> > http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/
> >
> > with a testcase.
> >
> This may be bug 19664. If I don't use
> -fvisibility-inlines-hidden it works.
>=20
> Odd, I thought visibility-inlines-hidden should affect the
> linker.
>=20

Typing without brain in gear, I mean't should *not*.

> But what do I know.
>=20
> sean
>=20
>