public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] x86: avoid strcmp() in a few places
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:08:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c60483a9-14fc-f2f4-0185-80c2510e45a5@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <beeaf9c6-7d1e-bcc6-624a-918c4a6c293e@suse.com>

Now that we have identifiers for the mnemonic strings we can avoid
strcmp() in a number of places, comparing the offsets into the mnemonic
string table instead. While doing this also
- convert a leftover strncmp() to startswith() (apparently an oversight
  when rebasing the original patch introducing the startswith() uses),
- use the new shorthand for current_templates->start also elsewhere in
  md_assemble() (valid up to the point where match_template() is
  called).
---
There are likely further opportunities for improvement, in particular
when currently comparing opcode space + opcode: E.g. in want_disp32()
we could instead compare against MN_lea, at once improving readability.
Thoughts?

--- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
@@ -4550,7 +4550,7 @@ load_insn_p (void)
 	return 0;
 
       /* pop.   */
-      if (strcmp (insn_name (&i.tm), "pop") == 0)
+      if (i.tm.mnem_off == MN_pop)
 	return 1;
     }
 
@@ -4919,7 +4919,8 @@ md_assemble (char *line)
 	}
       return;
     }
-  if (may_need_pass2 (current_templates->start))
+  t = current_templates->start;
+  if (may_need_pass2 (t))
     {
       /* Make a copy of the full line in case we need to retry.  */
       copy = xstrdup (line);
@@ -4946,14 +4947,14 @@ md_assemble (char *line)
      AT&T modes.  */
   if (intel_syntax
       && i.operands > 1
-      && (strcmp (mnemonic, "bound") != 0)
-      && (strncmp (mnemonic, "invlpg", 6) != 0)
+      && (t->mnem_off != MN_bound)
+      && !startswith (mnemonic, "invlpg")
       && !startswith (mnemonic, "monitor")
       && !startswith (mnemonic, "mwait")
-      && (strcmp (mnemonic, "pvalidate") != 0)
+      && (t->mnem_off != MN_pvalidate)
       && !startswith (mnemonic, "rmp")
-      && (strcmp (mnemonic, "tpause") != 0)
-      && (strcmp (mnemonic, "umwait") != 0)
+      && (t->mnem_off != MN_tpause)
+      && (t->mnem_off != MN_umwait)
       && !(i.operands == 2
 	   && operand_type_check (i.types[0], imm)
 	   && operand_type_check (i.types[1], imm)))
@@ -4962,15 +4963,14 @@ md_assemble (char *line)
   /* The order of the immediates should be reversed
      for 2 immediates extrq and insertq instructions */
   if (i.imm_operands == 2
-      && (strcmp (mnemonic, "extrq") == 0
-	  || strcmp (mnemonic, "insertq") == 0))
+      && (t->mnem_off == MN_extrq || t->mnem_off == MN_insertq))
       swap_2_operands (0, 1);
 
   if (i.imm_operands)
     optimize_imm ();
 
-  if (i.disp_operands && !want_disp32 (current_templates->start)
-      && (!current_templates->start->opcode_modifier.jump
+  if (i.disp_operands && !want_disp32 (t)
+      && (!t->opcode_modifier.jump
 	  || i.jumpabsolute || i.types[0].bitfield.baseindex))
     {
       for (j = 0; j < i.operands; ++j)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-13 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-13 11:04 [PATCH 0/8] x86: mnemonic and register string literals Jan Beulich
2023-01-13 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86: abstract out obtaining of a template's mnemonic Jan Beulich
2023-01-13 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86: move insn mnemonics to a separate table Jan Beulich
2023-01-13 11:12   ` Jan Beulich
2023-01-13 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86: re-use insn mnemonic strings as much as possible Jan Beulich
2023-01-13 11:07 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86: absorb allocation in i386-gen Jan Beulich
2023-01-13 11:08 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2023-01-13 11:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86: embed register names in reg_entry Jan Beulich
2023-01-13 11:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86: embed register and alike names in disassembler Jan Beulich
2023-01-13 11:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86: split i386-gen's opcode hash entry struct Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c60483a9-14fc-f2f4-0185-80c2510e45a5@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).